Suppr超能文献

四种用于计算促黄体生成素(LH)、促卵泡生成素(FSH)和生长激素(GH)放射免疫分析数据的数学模型的比较。

Comparison of four mathematical models for the calculation of radioimmunoassay data of LH, FSH, and GH.

作者信息

Geier T, Rohde W

出版信息

Endokrinologie. 1981 Dec;78(2-3):269-80.

PMID:6800778
Abstract

Weighted linear logit-log regression, point-to-point logit-log interpolation, smoothing spline approximation and the four-parameter logistic function calculated by non-linear regression have been compared. The data for comparison have been obtained from two different pool-sera for each of the LH-, FSH- and GH-RIA and from the basal serum LH values of two populations of children. The Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test was used for comparison: For GH there is no significant difference between all methods, for FSH the weighted linear logit-log regression and spline approximation appeared to be equivalent, but for LH no unequivocal assertion can be made. There is no significant difference between the mathematical models for determination of hormone concentration within one assay-run of a population as exemplified for LH. In addition, pool-sera data were subjected to an analysis of variance and the comparison of the results revealed that the different models did not lead to different statements about assay performance. The point-to-point logit-log interpolation is proposed as most simple curvilinear approximation for assays which cannot be linearized by logit-log transformation.

摘要

已对加权线性对数-逻辑回归、逐点对数-逻辑插值、平滑样条逼近以及通过非线性回归计算的四参数逻辑函数进行了比较。用于比较的数据取自LH、FSH和GH放射免疫分析中各自的两种不同混合血清,以及两组儿童的基础血清LH值。采用Wilcoxon配对符号秩检验进行比较:对于GH,所有方法之间无显著差异;对于FSH,加权线性对数-逻辑回归和样条逼近似乎等效,但对于LH无法做出明确断言。对于群体的一次分析运行中激素浓度的测定,数学模型之间无显著差异,以LH为例。此外,对混合血清数据进行了方差分析,结果比较表明不同模型对分析性能的描述并无差异。对于无法通过对数-逻辑变换线性化的分析,建议采用逐点对数-逻辑插值作为最简单的曲线逼近方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验