Carel R S
J Med Syst. 1982 Apr;6(2):121-30. doi: 10.1007/BF00997046.
The cost-effectiveness of a computerized ECG interpretation system in an ambulatory health care organization has been evaluated in comparison with a conventional (manual) system. The automated system was shown to be more cost-effective at a minimum load of 2,500 patients/month. At larger monthly loads an even greater cost-effectiveness was found, the average cost/ECG being about $2. In the manual system the cost/unit is practically independent of patient load. This is primarily due to the fact that 87% of the cost/ECG is attributable to wages and fees of highly trained personnel. In the automated system, on the other hand, the cost/ECG is heavily dependent on examinee load. This is due to the relatively large impact of equipment depreciation on fixed (and total) cost. Utilization of a computer-assisted system leads to marked reduction in cardiologists' interpretation time, substantially shorter turnaround time (of unconfirmed reports), and potential provision of simultaneous service at several remotely located "heart stations."
在一家门诊医疗保健机构中,已对计算机化心电图解读系统与传统(手动)系统的成本效益进行了评估。结果表明,在每月至少有2500名患者的负荷下,自动化系统更具成本效益。在每月负荷量更大的情况下,成本效益更高,平均每份心电图成本约为2美元。在手动系统中,单位成本实际上与患者负荷无关。这主要是因为每份心电图成本的87%归因于训练有素人员的工资和费用。另一方面,在自动化系统中,每份心电图成本在很大程度上取决于受检者负荷。这是由于设备折旧对固定(和总成本)成本的影响相对较大。使用计算机辅助系统可显著减少心脏病专家的解读时间,大幅缩短周转时间(未确认报告的),并有可能在几个偏远的“心脏站”同时提供服务。