Powell C, Regan C, Fabri P J, Ruberg R L
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1982 Jan-Feb;6(1):43-6. doi: 10.1177/014860718200600143.
A prospective, randomized study compared the use of Opsite and standard gauze/tape dressings in 261 patients receiving parenteral nutrition. Eighty-four patients had a source of external drainage and were evaluated as a separate group. Catheter-related sepsis was assessed by blood culture, catheter tip culture, clinical sepsis, and clinical defervescence of fever after catheter removal. Although no statistically significant difference between Opsite and standard dressings could be identified, Opsite-treated patients consistently had increased parameters of catheter-related sepsis in all comparisons. As used here, Opsite is probably not a suitable catheter dressing system for parenteral nutrition.
一项前瞻性随机研究比较了261例接受肠外营养患者使用Opsite敷料与标准纱布/胶带敷料的情况。84例有外部引流源的患者作为单独一组进行评估。通过血培养、导管尖端培养、临床败血症以及拔除导管后发热的临床消退情况来评估导管相关败血症。尽管Opsite敷料与标准敷料之间未发现统计学上的显著差异,但在所有比较中,使用Opsite敷料治疗的患者导管相关败血症参数持续增加。就此处使用情况而言,Opsite可能不是适合肠外营养的导管敷料系统。