Jeszenka E V, White W J, Lang C M, Hughes H C
Lab Anim Sci. 1981 Oct;31(5 Pt 1):494-7.
The effectiveness of a chemical scrubber utilizing a recycled aqueous media was compared to high efficiency particulate air filtration in its ability to remove bacteria from recycled air. Two bacteria, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Bacillus subtilis, which have different biologic and physical properties were used in the study. The scrubber, using an aqueous chlorine-dioxide solution, and high efficiency particulate air filtration were equally effective in removing both types of bacteria from recycled air. Viable bacteria could not be recovered from the processed air following either treatment. When the scrubber was used with the chlorine dioxide solution, sufficient chlorine dioxide residues remained in the scrubber processed air to affect bacterial counts in the isolator to which the processed air was returned. The bacteria differed in their susceptibility to low levels of chlorine dioxide in the return air which influenced the number of viable organisms recovered under similar conditions. The use of water without a chemical additive eliminated bacteria in recycled air immediately following the start of the unit but allowed their eventual build-up in recycled air to concentrations of approximately half that of untreated air. Overall, the use of a chemical scrubber for the removal of bacteria from recycled air appeared to be no more effective than high efficiency particulate air filtration especially if the scrubbing media is recycled.
将利用循环水性介质的化学洗涤器与高效空气微粒过滤在从循环空气中去除细菌的能力方面进行了比较。研究中使用了两种具有不同生物学和物理特性的细菌,即表皮葡萄球菌和枯草芽孢杆菌。使用二氧化氯水溶液的洗涤器和高效空气微粒过滤在从循环空气中去除这两种细菌方面同样有效。经过任何一种处理后,均无法从处理后的空气中回收活菌。当洗涤器与二氧化氯溶液一起使用时,在洗涤器处理后的空气中会残留足够的二氧化氯,从而影响处理后的空气返回的隔离器中的细菌数量。这两种细菌对回风低浓度二氧化氯的敏感性不同,这影响了在类似条件下回收的活菌数量。使用没有化学添加剂的水在设备启动后立即消除了循环空气中的细菌,但最终会使细菌在循环空气中积累到约为未处理空气浓度一半的水平。总体而言,使用化学洗涤器从循环空气中去除细菌似乎并不比高效空气微粒过滤更有效,尤其是在洗涤介质循环使用的情况下。