Williams F L, Tucker S R
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1982 May;39(5):835-9.
The process of evaluating computer vendors' responses to a request for proposal (RFP) is described. The steps involved are (1) reviewing vendor proposals, (2) attending vendor presentations (3) reviewing references, (4) visiting vendor clients, (5) reviewing vendor stability, and (6) making the decision. The primary purpose of reviewing proposals is to reduce the number of vendors under consideration. Vendors' proposals should be attended by representatives of all affected departments, and each vendor's presentation should be discussed with the RFP or RFP extension as a guide. Interviewing users of a system helps determine how the system works in practice and how accurately the vendor has represented his product. Likewise, visiting selective vendor clients, without the vendor representative being present, helps establish whether the persons actually using the system like it and find it easy to use. A vendor's stability can be best determined by examining its financial stability and its commitment to the pharmacy product. Making the selection requires elimination of vendors that do not meet minimum requirements, rating the remaining vendors numerically, and deciding which features of each system are most desirable. The vendor selection process provides an opportunity to thoroughly study an operation and helps set priorities for the department.
描述了评估计算机供应商对征求建议书(RFP)回复的过程。涉及的步骤包括:(1)审查供应商提案;(2)参加供应商演示;(3)审查参考资料;(4)拜访供应商客户;(5)审查供应商稳定性;(6)做出决策。审查提案的主要目的是减少正在考虑的供应商数量。所有受影响部门的代表都应参加供应商的提案,并且应以RFP或RFP扩展为指导讨论每个供应商的演示。采访系统用户有助于确定系统在实际中的运行情况以及供应商对其产品的描述有多准确。同样,在没有供应商代表在场的情况下拜访选定的供应商客户,有助于确定实际使用该系统的人是否喜欢它并觉得它易于使用。供应商的稳定性可以通过检查其财务稳定性及其对药房产品的投入来最好地确定。进行选择需要淘汰不符合最低要求的供应商,对其余供应商进行数字评分,并确定每个系统的哪些功能最令人满意。供应商选择过程提供了一个彻底研究一项业务的机会,并有助于为部门确定优先事项。