Lievaart M, de Jong P A
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Oct 15;144(4):376-86. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(82)90240-x.
The efficacy of the Dutch system of obstetric care was investigated by comparison of the outcomes of two groups of supposedly normal first pregnancies and deliveries that were solely cared for by midwives (n = 85) or by gynecologists (n = 27). The outcome was measured by pH, PCO2, and base deficit in arterial cord blood (early morbidity) and by neurological examination with Prechtl's method (late morbidity). The occurrence of 10 neurologically nonoptimal infants in the midwife group is thought incompatible with the basis philosophy of the Dutch obstetric system, which is that midwives are able to select the normal pregnancies out of the group of women who present for obstetric care and can assist in maintaining the normal state in these selected cases in the course of delivery. The acid-base values were less favorable in the midwife group than in the gynecologist group. Neurological nonoptimality in the midwife group was related to acidosis. The influence of the site of birth (home or hospital--ambulatory) could be virtually ruled out.
通过比较两组据推测为正常的首次妊娠及分娩的结局,对荷兰产科护理体系的疗效进行了调查。这两组分别由助产士单独护理(n = 85)或由妇科医生单独护理(n = 27)。结局通过动脉脐血的pH值、PCO₂和碱缺失(早期发病率)以及采用普雷希特尔方法进行的神经学检查(晚期发病率)来衡量。助产士组出现10例神经学检查结果不理想的婴儿,这被认为与荷兰产科体系的基本理念不符,该理念认为助产士能够从前来接受产科护理的女性群体中挑选出正常妊娠的情况,并能在分娩过程中协助这些选定病例维持正常状态。助产士组的酸碱值比妇科医生组的更不理想。助产士组的神经学检查结果不理想与酸中毒有关。出生地点(家中或医院——门诊)的影响实际上可以排除。