• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

康瑞人格量表在临床环境中的信度与稳定性。

Reliability and stability of the Comrey Personality Scales in a clinical setting.

作者信息

Wilcox W W, Wenger W K

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1978 Apr;34(2):555-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197804)34:2<555::aid-jclp2270340264>3.0.co;2-x.

DOI:10.1002/1097-4679(197804)34:2<555::aid-jclp2270340264>3.0.co;2-x
PMID:681540
Abstract

Examined split-half reliabilities, retest reliabilities, and stability of the Comrey Personality Scales (CPS) (Comrey, 1970) for a Navy sample of 200 young drug abusers tested at the beginning and end of rehabilitation in a no-feedback, compulsory participation setting. The pre-rehabilitation split-half reliabilities for the eight personality scales ranged from .73 to .94, with an average of .85, and ranged from .74 to .91, with an average of .83, on the post-rehabilitation administration. Retest reliabilities for the eight scales were between .39 and .64, with an average of .52. Post-rehabilitation means were significantly higher on four of the eight scales, and one scale mean was significantly lower. It is concluded that the CPS is appropriate in a clinical setting in which test participation is compulsory and test feedback is not made available to the respondents.

摘要

在无反馈、强制参与的环境下,对200名年轻吸毒海军人员样本在康复开始和结束时进行测试,考察了康瑞尔人格量表(CPS)(康瑞尔,1970)的分半信度、重测信度和稳定性。康复前,八个人格量表的分半信度在0.73至0.94之间,平均为0.85;康复后施测时,分半信度在0.74至0.91之间,平均为0.83。八个量表的重测信度在0.39至0.64之间,平均为0.52。康复后,八个量表中有四个量表的平均分显著更高,一个量表的平均分显著更低。结论是,在测试参与为强制且不向被试提供测试反馈的临床环境中,CPS是适用的。

相似文献

1
Reliability and stability of the Comrey Personality Scales in a clinical setting.康瑞人格量表在临床环境中的信度与稳定性。
J Clin Psychol. 1978 Apr;34(2):555-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197804)34:2<555::aid-jclp2270340264>3.0.co;2-x.
2
Drug abuses in the military: correlates of successful rehabilitation.军队中的药物滥用:成功康复的相关因素
J Clin Psychol. 1978 Jan;34(1):233-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197801)34:1<233::aid-jclp2270340148>3.0.co;2-c.
3
Factor Analysis of the Comrey Personality Scales in an Australian Sample.澳大利亚样本中康瑞人格量表的因素分析
Multivariate Behav Res. 1988 Jul 1;23(3):397-411. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2303_7.
4
Detection Of Faking on the Comrey Personality Scales.康瑞尔人格量表中伪装现象的检测
Multivariate Behav Res. 1975 Jul 1;10(3):311-9. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1003_4.
5
Personality structure of Mexican Americans using the Comrey Personality Scales.使用康瑞尔人格量表对墨西哥裔美国人的人格结构进行研究。
J Pers Assess. 1983 Feb;47(1):100-6. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4701_12.
6
A profile of personality for a Russian sample: as indicated by the Comrey Personality Scales.俄罗斯样本的人格剖析:由康瑞尔人格量表所示。
J Pers Assess. 1993 Apr;60(2):267-84. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6002_5.
7
The relative effectiveness of a medical hospitalization program vs a feedback-behavior modification program in treating alcohol and drug abusers.
Int J Addict. 1976;11(2):269-82. doi: 10.3109/10826087609058799.
8
Rehabilitation of drug and alcohol abusers in the U.S. Army.美国陆军中药物和酒精滥用者的康复治疗。
Int J Addict. 1974;9(1):41-55.
9
CONSTRUCT VALIDATION OF THE COMREY PERSONALITY SCALES.康瑞人格量表的结构效度验证
Multivariate Behav Res. 1970;5(4):469-77. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0504_5.
10
Ego Function Assessment of substance abusers: standardization and reliability.药物滥用者的自我功能评估:标准化与可靠性
Psychol Rep. 2000 Dec;87(3 Pt 2):1185-95. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2000.87.3f.1185.