Lehmann C, Leiken A M
Am J Med Technol. 1982 Oct;48(10):833-6.
In the present economy, much concern has been focused on the cost and medical efficacy of laboratory tests being performed. This study examined the difference in laboratory costs associated with physician's use of selective vs. panel chemistries and the frequency of inefficient use of laboratory tests. A determination of the difference in the average number of laboratory visits needed to reach diagnosis associated with the use of these two test methods was made. The study was conducted at a 270-bed community hospital in suburban New York, where the physicians are free to choose selective and/or panel chemistries. Random selection of 200 outpatient records revealed that three types of ordering patterns existed: panels, selective, and a combination of the two. Of the three, panel testing resulted in substantially lower costs and fewer return visits to the laboratory than either selective or mixed (combination of selective and panel) testing.
在当前的经济形势下,人们非常关注所进行的实验室检查的成本和医疗效果。本研究调查了医生使用选择性化学检查与组合化学检查相关的实验室成本差异,以及实验室检查低效使用的频率。确定了使用这两种检查方法达到诊断所需的平均实验室就诊次数的差异。该研究在纽约郊区一家拥有270张床位的社区医院进行,那里的医生可以自由选择选择性化学检查和/或组合化学检查。随机选取200份门诊记录显示,存在三种医嘱模式:组合检查、选择性检查以及两者的组合。在这三种模式中,组合检查产生的成本大幅低于选择性检查或混合(选择性检查与组合检查的组合)检查,且返回实验室的次数也更少。