Sprengers E D, Koenderman A H, Staal G E
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1983 Jan 4;755(1):112-8. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(83)90280-5.
Rat brain mitochondrial hexokinase (ATP: D-hexose 6-phosphotransferase, EC 2.7.1.1) was solubilized by treatment of the mitochondria with glucose 6-phosphate and partly purified. The solubilized enzyme was compared with the cytosolic enzyme fraction. The solubilized and cytosolic enzymes were also compared with the enzyme bound to the mitochondrial membrane. The following observations were made. 1. There is no difference in electrophoretic mobility on cellulose-acetate between the cytosolic and the solubilized enzyme. Both fractions are hexokinase isoenzyme I. 2. There is no difference in kinetic parameters between the cytosolic or solubilized enzymes (P less than 0.001). For the cytosolic enzyme Km for glucose was 0.067 mM (S.E. = 0.024, n = 7); Km for MgATP2- was 0.42 mM (S.E. = 0.13, n = 7) and Ki,app for glucose 1,6-diphosphate was 0.084 mM (S.E. = 0.011, n = 5). For the solubilized enzyme Km for glucose was 0.071 mM (S.E. = 0.021, n = 6); Km for MgATP2- was 0.38 mM (S.E. = 0.11, n = 6) and Ki,app for glucose 1,6-diphosphate was 0.074 mM (S.E. = 0.010, n = 5). However when bound to the mitochondrial membrane, the enzyme has higher affinities for its substrates and a lower affinity for the inhibitor glucose 1,6-diphosphate. For the mitochondrial fraction Km for glucose was 0.045 mM (S.E. = 0.013, n = 7); Km for MgATP2- was 0.13 mM (S.E. = 0.02, n = 7) and Ki,app for glucose 1,6-diphosphate was 0.33 mM (S.E. = 0.03, n = 5). 3. The cytosolic and solubilized enzyme could be (re)-bound to depleted mitochondria to the same extent and with the same affinity. Limited proteolysis fully destroyed the enzyme's ability to bind to depleted mitochondria. 4. Our data support the hypothesis that soluble- and solubilizable enzyme from rat brain are one and the same enzyme, and that there is a simple equilibrium between the enzyme in these two pools.
用6-磷酸葡萄糖处理大鼠脑线粒体,使其溶解并部分纯化线粒体己糖激酶(ATP:D-己糖6-磷酸转移酶,EC 2.7.1.1)。将溶解的酶与胞质酶部分进行比较。还将溶解的酶和胞质酶与结合在线粒体膜上的酶进行比较。得到以下观察结果。1. 胞质酶和溶解的酶在醋酸纤维素上的电泳迁移率没有差异。两个部分均为己糖激酶同工酶I。2. 胞质酶或溶解的酶之间的动力学参数没有差异(P<0.001)。对于胞质酶,葡萄糖的Km为0.067 mM(标准误=0.024,n=7);MgATP2-的Km为0.42 mM(标准误=0.13,n=7),葡萄糖1,6-二磷酸的表观抑制常数Ki,app为0.084 mM(标准误=0.011,n=5)。对于溶解的酶,葡萄糖的Km为0.071 mM(标准误=0.021,n=6);MgATP2-的Km为0.38 mM(标准误=0.11,n=6),葡萄糖1,6-二磷酸的表观抑制常数Ki,app为0.074 mM(标准误=0.010,n=5)。然而,当结合到线粒体膜上时,该酶对其底物具有更高的亲和力,对抑制剂葡萄糖1,6-二磷酸具有更低的亲和力。对于线粒体部分,葡萄糖的Km为0.045 mM(标准误=0.013,n=7);MgATP2-的Km为0.13 mM(标准误=0.02,n=7),葡萄糖1,6-二磷酸的表观抑制常数Ki,app为0.33 mM(标准误=0.03,n=5)。3. 胞质酶和溶解的酶可以以相同的程度和相同的亲和力(重新)结合到耗尽的线粒体上。有限的蛋白水解完全破坏了该酶与耗尽的线粒体结合的能力。4. 我们的数据支持以下假设:大鼠脑中的可溶性和可溶解酶是同一种酶,并且在这两个池中的酶之间存在简单的平衡。