Gupta B N, Thames M D
Circ Res. 1983 Mar;52(3):291-301. doi: 10.1161/01.res.52.3.291.
The purpose of this study was to determine the behavior of left ventricular mechanoreceptors with myelinated vagal afferents and to compare them with endings with nonmyelinated vagal afferents. Single unit activity was recorded from 13 endings with nonmyelinated vagal afferents (conduction velocity 2.1 +/- 0.3 m/sec) and from 16 endings with myelinated vagal afferents (conduction velocity 7.3 +/- 1.3 m/sec). Resting discharge frequencies of nonmyelinated afferents and of myelinated vagal afferents were 1.7 +/- 0.3 and 2.7 +/- 0.5 imp/sec (P less than 0.1), respectively (at left ventricular end diastolic pressure of 6 mm Hg for both groups). Ten of 16 myelinated vagal afferents had pulse synchronous discharge under basal condition, whereas only 3 of 13 nonmyelinated vagal afferents had such activity. During aortic occlusion, the discharge of myelinated vagal afferents increased 1.7 +/- 0.3 imp/sec per mm Hg, whereas nonmyelinated vagal afferents increased significantly (P less than 0.05) less (0.5 +/- 0.1 imp/sec per mm Hg). Discharge for both groups was linearly related to left ventricular end-diastolic pressure but not to left ventricular systolic pressure. Increases in left ventricular systolic pressure alone did not increase firing for either group. During aortic occlusion, the maximum discharge rates of myelinated vagal afferents (43 +/- 7 imp/sec) were significantly higher than those of nonmyelinated vagal afferents (14 +/- 3 imp/sec) at left ventricular end-diastolic pressure of 30 +/- 2 and 24 +/- 2 mm Hg, respectively. Both groups increased their discharge during volume expansion with myelinated vagal afferents showing greater sensitivity than nonmyelinated vagal afferents. All endings studied were in the inferoposterior wall of the left ventricle. All nonmyelinated vagal afferents were in or near the epicardium. In contrast, myelinated vagal afferents were equally distributed between the endocardium and the epicardium. Myelinated vagal afferents had discrete receptive fields (1-2 mm2) whereas those of nonmyelinated vagal afferents were much larger (1 cm2). In conclusion, the discharge of left ventricular endings with nonmyelinated vagal afferents and myelinated vagal afferents both appear to be determined mainly by changes in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. They may be located at different depths in the left ventricular wall. Myelinated vagal afferents have greater sensitivity and maximum firing frequencies than nonmyelinated vagal afferents.
本研究的目的是确定具有有髓迷走神经传入纤维的左心室机械感受器的行为,并将其与具有无髓迷走神经传入纤维的终末进行比较。记录了13个具有无髓迷走神经传入纤维(传导速度2.1±0.3米/秒)的终末和16个具有有髓迷走神经传入纤维(传导速度7.3±1.3米/秒)的终末的单单位活动。无髓传入纤维和有髓迷走神经传入纤维的静息放电频率分别为1.7±0.3和2.7±0.5次/秒(P<0.1)(两组的左心室舒张末期压力均为6毫米汞柱)。16个有髓迷走神经传入纤维中有10个在基础状态下具有脉搏同步放电,而13个无髓迷走神经传入纤维中只有3个具有这种活动。在主动脉阻断期间,有髓迷走神经传入纤维的放电以每毫米汞柱1.7±0.3次/秒的速度增加,而无髓迷走神经传入纤维增加得明显较少(P<0.05)(每毫米汞柱0.5±0.1次/秒)。两组的放电均与左心室舒张末期压力呈线性相关,但与左心室收缩压无关。单独左心室收缩压的升高并不会增加两组的放电频率。在主动脉阻断期间,在左心室舒张末期压力分别为30±2和24±2毫米汞柱时,有髓迷走神经传入纤维的最大放电率(43±7次/秒)显著高于无髓迷走神经传入纤维(14±3次/秒)。在容量扩张期间,两组的放电均增加,有髓迷走神经传入纤维比无髓迷走神经传入纤维表现出更高的敏感性。所有研究的终末均位于左心室的下后壁。所有无髓迷走神经传入纤维均位于心外膜内或其附近。相比之下,有髓迷走神经传入纤维在心内膜和心外膜之间均匀分布。有髓迷走神经传入纤维具有离散的感受野(1-2平方毫米),而无髓迷走神经传入纤维的感受野则大得多(1平方厘米)。总之,具有无髓迷走神经传入纤维和有髓迷走神经传入纤维的左心室终末的放电似乎都主要由左心室舒张末期压力的变化决定。它们可能位于左心室壁的不同深度。有髓迷走神经传入纤维比无髓迷走神经传入纤维具有更高的敏感性和最大放电频率。