Hackenbroch M H, Waldecker B, Prömper K H
Rontgenblatter. 1983 Feb;36(2):50-5.
Side by side with myelography, computed tomography is growing in importance as far as the diagnosis of the lumbar compression syndrome is concerned. From May 1980 to the end of April 1982, the authors employed at the Cologne University Clinic of Orthopaedics in 176 patients operated either for the first time or several times, myelography alone in 54 cases, and myelography combined with computed tomography in 98 cases, whereas computed tomography alone was used 24 times, in each case for the purpose of preoperative diagnosis. An epicritical analysis of the two last-named groups of examinations, basing on the findings made as a result of the operation, showed that computed tomography was superior in respect of the accuracy in determining the level and affected side of the compression. Two CT examinations only could not be utilised for technical reasons. Nine false-positive or false-negative cases (plus two examinations which were useless for technical reasons) were seen among the 98 myelographies of the patient group in question. Besides the equivalent information given by computed tomography in respect of the level and side of the compression, CT supplies additional information regarding constriction of the vertebral canal, defined osseous stenoses, preference for a particular side and site of prolapsed disk tissue, and on the cause of the compression in case there is a considerable stoppage of contrast medium. Computed tomography is better suited than myelography in the immediate postoperative phase for follow-up examinations which are aimed at differentiating renewed prolapses, haemorrhages, or cicatrised changes. Provided there is enough capacity for examination, it seems possible that the noninvasive computed tomography will eventually replace invasive myelography as a routine examination method in case of relevant indications.
就腰椎压迫综合征的诊断而言,计算机断层扫描与脊髓造影相比,其重要性日益增加。从1980年5月至1982年4月底,作者在科隆大学骨科诊所对176例患者进行了手术,这些患者要么是首次手术,要么是接受了多次手术。其中,54例仅进行了脊髓造影,98例进行了脊髓造影联合计算机断层扫描,而单独使用计算机断层扫描24次,每次都是为了进行术前诊断。根据手术结果对最后两组检查进行的批判性分析表明,在确定压迫水平和患侧方面,计算机断层扫描的准确性更高。仅因技术原因有两次计算机断层扫描检查无法使用。在所讨论的患者组的98次脊髓造影中,发现了9例假阳性或假阴性病例(另外还有两次因技术原因无用的检查)。除了计算机断层扫描在压迫水平和侧方方面提供的等效信息外,计算机断层扫描还提供了有关椎管狭窄、明确的骨性狭窄、椎间盘组织突出对特定侧和部位的偏好,以及在造影剂有相当程度阻塞的情况下压迫原因的额外信息。在术后即刻阶段,计算机断层扫描比脊髓造影更适合进行旨在区分再次突出、出血或瘢痕化改变的随访检查。如果有足够的检查能力,在相关适应症的情况下,无创的计算机断层扫描最终有可能取代有创的脊髓造影成为常规检查方法。