Suppr超能文献

头臀长和双顶径预测的预产期估计可靠性比较。

A comparison of the reliability of the estimated date of confinement predicted by crown-rump length and biparietal diameter.

作者信息

Kopta M M, May R R, Crane J P

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Mar 1;145(5):562-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)91196-1.

Abstract

First trimester crown-rump length (CRL) followed by a second-trimester biparietal diameter (BPD) were sonographically measured in 27 patients. Each value was independently used to prospectively predict an estimated date of confinement. The actual delivery date was compared with the estimated dates of confinement predicted by the CRL and the BPD. The mean error in predicting the actual date of delivery by CRL was 7.73 days as opposed to 7.65 days with the BPD. This difference is not statistically significant (p greater than 0.9). In both methods there was a greater tendency to overestimate the actual date of delivery. Contrary to widespread belief, the present study shows that a second-trimester BPD is as accurate as a first-trimester CRL in establishing an estimated date of confinement. Additional benefits of second-trimester scanning include the ability to determine placental localization, evaluate amniotic fluid volume, and exclude many congenital abnormalities.

摘要

对27例患者进行超声测量,孕早期测量顶臀长(CRL),孕中期测量双顶径(BPD)。每个测量值均独立用于前瞻性预测预产期。将实际分娩日期与通过CRL和BPD预测的预产期进行比较。CRL预测实际分娩日期的平均误差为7.73天,而BPD为7.65天。这种差异无统计学意义(p大于0.9)。两种方法均有高估实际分娩日期的倾向。与普遍看法相反,本研究表明,孕中期BPD在确定预产期方面与孕早期CRL一样准确。孕中期超声检查的其他好处包括能够确定胎盘位置、评估羊水量以及排除许多先天性异常。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验