Kinoshita S
J Electrocardiol. 1983 Jan;16(1):7-14. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(83)80153-8.
Three patients with intermittent ventricular parasystole are reported in whom the presence of second degree entrance block of type II or a type similar to that was shown. In all the patients, when a sinus beat occurred within a certain (the first) critical period after the preceding ectopic beat, the parasystolic focus was protected from this sinus impulse. When, on the other hand, a sinus beat occurred beyond another (the second) critical period after the ectopic beat, this sinus impulse reached and discharged the focus without an appreciable conduction delay. In one patient the second critical period was equal to the first one, while, in the other two, the second one was longer than the first one. In these two patients, when a sinus beat occurred between the two critical periods after the ectopic beat, this sinus impulse reached and discharged the focus after marked delay, and thereafter became a manifest or concealed re-entrant ventricular extrasystole. On the basis of these observations, an attempt was made to clarify the difference in mechanism between type I and type II second degree entrance block.
本文报道了3例间歇性心室并行心律患者,其显示存在II型或类似类型的二度传入阻滞。在所有患者中,当前一个异位搏动后的特定(第一个)临界期内出现窦性搏动时,并行心律灶受到该窦性冲动的保护。另一方面,当异位搏动后的另一个(第二个)临界期之后出现窦性搏动时,该窦性冲动到达并使该病灶除极,且无明显的传导延迟。在1例患者中,第二个临界期与第一个相等,而在另外2例患者中,第二个临界期长于第一个。在这2例患者中,当异位搏动后的窦性搏动出现在两个临界期之间时,该窦性冲动在明显延迟后到达并使病灶除极,此后成为显性或隐匿性折返性室性期前收缩。基于这些观察结果,试图阐明I型和II型二度传入阻滞在机制上的差异。