Andersen O, Nielsen M K, Eriksen P B, Fenger M, Knudsen P J
J Pharm Sci. 1983 Feb;72(2):158-61. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600720216.
Ten healthy volunteers received two sustained-release preparations as a single and multiple dose regimen in an open crossover study. Plasma theophylline concentrations were measured by an enzyme immunoassay. The limited fluctuation of the theophylline levels at steady state, with twice daily administration, clearly demonstrated the marked sustained release properties of both preparations. Results indicate similar properties for the two preparations. Significant correlations between the single dose period and steady state were found for Cmax and AUC (r = 0.76 and 0.87, respectively) with one formulation, whereas this was not the case for the other (r = 0.27 and 0.49). The daily dose necessary to keep the plasma concentration within the therapeutic range of 55-110 mumole/liter varied from 7.9 to 22.9 mg/kg. Only mild side effects were recorded, but they were not correlated to the plasma theophylline concentration.
在一项开放性交叉研究中,10名健康志愿者接受了两种缓释制剂,采用单剂量和多剂量给药方案。血浆茶碱浓度通过酶免疫测定法测量。在每日两次给药的情况下,稳态时茶碱水平的有限波动清楚地表明了两种制剂都具有显著的缓释特性。结果表明两种制剂具有相似的特性。对于一种制剂,单剂量期与稳态之间的Cmax和AUC存在显著相关性(r分别为0.76和0.87),而另一种制剂则不然(r为0.27和0.49)。将血浆浓度维持在55 - 110微摩尔/升治疗范围内所需的每日剂量为7.9至22.9毫克/千克。仅记录到轻微的副作用,但它们与血浆茶碱浓度无关。