Suppr超能文献

经幕下和经天幕入路松果体区的比较。

Comparison of the infratentorial and transtentorial approaches to the pineal region.

作者信息

Reid W S, Clark W K

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 1978 Jul-Aug;3(1):1-8. doi: 10.1227/00006123-197807000-00001.

Abstract

During the past 10 years, two different operative approaches to the pineal region have been recommended by different authors. Numerous reports have appeared in the literature, indicating the safe use of one or the other of these two techniques for the excision of masses in the pineal region. This paper reports experience with both techniques in the treatment of 15 patients with mass lesions in this area. Four patients underwent a supracerebellar infratentorial approach and 11 patients underwent an occipital transtentorial approach to the pineal region. These two approaches are compared in terms of anatomical exposure, technical difficulties, and real or potential complications. The authors prefer the occipital transtentorial approach in dealing with lesions in the pineal region.

摘要

在过去10年里,不同的作者推荐了两种不同的针对松果体区的手术入路。文献中出现了大量报告,表明这两种技术中的任何一种在切除松果体区肿块时均可安全使用。本文报告了使用这两种技术治疗该区域15例肿块性病变患者的经验。4例患者采用小脑上幕下入路,11例患者采用枕下经幕入路到达松果体区。从解剖暴露、技术难度以及实际或潜在并发症方面对这两种入路进行了比较。作者在处理松果体区病变时更倾向于枕下经幕入路。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验