Suppr超能文献

经幕下和经天幕入路松果体区的比较。

Comparison of the infratentorial and transtentorial approaches to the pineal region.

作者信息

Reid W S, Clark W K

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 1978 Jul-Aug;3(1):1-8. doi: 10.1227/00006123-197807000-00001.

Abstract

During the past 10 years, two different operative approaches to the pineal region have been recommended by different authors. Numerous reports have appeared in the literature, indicating the safe use of one or the other of these two techniques for the excision of masses in the pineal region. This paper reports experience with both techniques in the treatment of 15 patients with mass lesions in this area. Four patients underwent a supracerebellar infratentorial approach and 11 patients underwent an occipital transtentorial approach to the pineal region. These two approaches are compared in terms of anatomical exposure, technical difficulties, and real or potential complications. The authors prefer the occipital transtentorial approach in dealing with lesions in the pineal region.

摘要

在过去10年里,不同的作者推荐了两种不同的针对松果体区的手术入路。文献中出现了大量报告,表明这两种技术中的任何一种在切除松果体区肿块时均可安全使用。本文报告了使用这两种技术治疗该区域15例肿块性病变患者的经验。4例患者采用小脑上幕下入路,11例患者采用枕下经幕入路到达松果体区。从解剖暴露、技术难度以及实际或潜在并发症方面对这两种入路进行了比较。作者在处理松果体区病变时更倾向于枕下经幕入路。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验