作为宫内节育器服务提供者的医生与辅助助产士对比研究：一项在土耳其和菲律宾开展的研究 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Physicians vs. auxiliary nurse-midwives as providers of IUD services: a study in Turkey and the Philippines.

作者信息

Eren N, Ramos R, Gray R H

出版信息

Stud Fam Plann. 1983 Feb;14(2):43-7.

PMID:6836665

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Physicians vs. auxiliary nurse-midwives as providers of IUD services: a study in Turkey and the Philippines.作为宫内节育器服务提供者的医生与辅助助产士对比研究：一项在土耳其和菲律宾开展的研究

Stud Fam Plann. 1983 Feb;14(2):43-7.

Training auxiliary nurse-midwives to provide IUD services in Turkey and the Philippines.在土耳其和菲律宾培训辅助护士助产士以提供宫内节育器服务。

Stud Fam Plann. 1980 May;11(5):178-87.

Comparative study of safety and efficacy of IUD insertions by physicians and nursing personnel in Brazil.巴西医生和护理人员放置宫内节育器的安全性和有效性比较研究。

Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1995 Sep;29(3):206-15.

Can midwives be trained to insert IUDS? Results from Turkey.

Entre Nous Cph Den. 1988 Oct(12):10-2.

Expanded services for intrauterine contraception in Sudan.苏丹宫内节育器服务的扩展

East Afr Med J. 1991 Feb;68(2):70-3.

Nurse-midwife insertion of the copper T in Thailand: performance, acceptance, and programmatic effects.泰国护士助产士放置铜T形宫内节育器：操作情况、接受度及项目效果

Stud Fam Plann. 1977 Sep;8(9):237-43.

Paramedic insertion of intrauterine device in a Malaysian family planning clinic.护理人员在马来西亚一家计划生育诊所进行宫内节育器放置操作。

Malays J Reprod Health. 1987 Jun;5(1):11-6.

The Bohol IUD program.薄荷岛宫内节育器项目

Stud Fam Plann. 1979 Jun-Jul;10(6-7):211-2.

Nurse-midwives insert IUDs in Barbados.在巴巴多斯，助产士会插入宫内节育器。

IPPF Med Bull. 1967;1(6):4.

Swedish midwives--a case of professional domination of family planning provision by women.瑞典助产士——女性主导计划生育服务的一个案例。

IPPF Eur Reg Inf. 1984 Apr;13(1):46-7.

引用本文的文献

Delivering postpartum family planning services in Nepal: are providers supportive?在尼泊尔提供产后计划生育服务：提供者是否支持？

BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 6;18(1):948. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3777-3.

Systematic review on human resources for health interventions to improve maternal health outcomes: evidence from low- and middle-income countries.关于改善孕产妇健康结果的卫生干预措施人力资源的系统评价：来自低收入和中等收入国家的证据。

Hum Resour Health. 2016 Mar 12;14:10. doi: 10.1186/s12960-016-0106-y.

Comparison of outcomes at 6 weeks following postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device insertions by doctors and nurses in India: a case-control study.印度医生和护士产后宫内节育器置入术后6周结局的比较：一项病例对照研究。

Contraception. 2016 Apr;93(4):347-355. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.12.012. Epub 2015 Dec 29.

Optimizing the delivery of contraceptives in low- and middle-income countries through task shifting: a systematic review of effectiveness and safety.通过任务转移优化低收入和中等收入国家的避孕药具供应：有效性和安全性的系统评价

Reprod Health. 2015 Apr 1;12:27. doi: 10.1186/s12978-015-0002-2.

Knowledge and perceptions of the intrauterine device among family planning providers in Nepal: a cross-sectional analysis by cadre and sector.尼泊尔计划生育服务提供者对宫内节育器的认知与看法：按干部和部门进行的横断面分析

BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jan 28;15:39. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0701-y.

Surgical efficiencies and quality in the performance of voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) procedures in Kenya, South Africa, Tanzania, and Zimbabwe.肯尼亚、南非、坦桑尼亚和津巴布韦实施自愿男性医学包皮环切术（VMMC）的手术效率和质量。

PLoS One. 2014 May 6;9(5):e84271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084271. eCollection 2014.

Quality of care provided by mid-level health workers: systematic review and meta-analysis.中级卫生工作者提供的医疗质量：系统评价和荟萃分析。

Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Nov 1;91(11):824-833I. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.118786.

Case Study: Does training of private networks of Family Planning clinicians in urban Pakistan affect service utilization?案例研究：在巴基斯坦城市中培训计划生育临床医生的私人网络是否会影响服务利用？

BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2010 Nov 9;10:26. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-10-26.

Making family planning accessible in resource-poor settings.在资源匮乏的环境中普及计划生育。

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Oct 27;364(1532):3093-9. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0172.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验