Donovan J E, Jessor R
Am J Public Health. 1983 May;73(5):543-52. doi: 10.2105/ajph.73.5.543.
Analyses of data from two nationwide surveys of high school students, one carried out in 1974 and the other in 1978, suggest that problem drinking may be seen as yet another step along an underlying dimension of involvement with both licit and illicit drugs. The dimension of involvement with drugs consists of the following levels: nonuse of alcohol or illicit drugs; nonproblem use of alcohol; marijuana use; problem drinking; use of pills (amphetamines, barbiturates, hallucinogenic drugs); and the use of "hard drugs" such as cocaine or heroin. The dimension possesses excellent Guttman-scale properties in both national samples as well as in subsamples differing in gender and ethnic background. The ordering of the levels of involvement was confirmed by the ordering of the alcohol-drug involvement groups based on their mean scores on measures of psychosocial proneness for involvement in problem behavior. The excessive use of a licit drug, i.e., problem drinking, appears to indicate greater involvement in drug use than does the use of an illicit drug, marijuana. This finding points to the importance of distinguishing between use and problem use of drugs in efforts to understand adolescent drug involvement.
对两项全国性高中生调查数据的分析表明,问题饮酒可能被视为在合法和非法药物使用这一潜在维度上的又一步。这两项调查分别于1974年和1978年进行。药物使用维度包括以下几个层次:不使用酒精或非法药物;非问题性饮酒;使用大麻;问题饮酒;使用药丸(安非他明、巴比妥酸盐、致幻药物);以及使用可卡因或海洛因等“硬性毒品”。在全国样本以及不同性别和种族背景的子样本中,该维度都具有出色的古特曼量表属性。基于参与问题行为的心理社会倾向测量的平均得分,酒精-药物使用群体的排序证实了参与层次的排序。与使用非法药物大麻相比,合法药物的过度使用,即问题饮酒,似乎表明对药物使用的参与程度更高。这一发现指出了在理解青少年药物使用情况时区分药物使用和问题使用的重要性。