Wallach E E, Manara L R, Eisenberg E
Fertil Steril. 1983 May;39(5):609-17. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)47054-8.
Results of tubal reconstructive surgery must be periodically reviewed. This approach permits evaluation of improvements in individual techniques as well as comparison with the results of others performing similar surgery. It also enables meaningful dialogue between physician and patient regarding prospects for success in the physician's own hands. The senior author's experience with 143 cases of tubal reconstructive surgery is presented. Results of four distinct tubal reconstructive procedures are compared with results reported in the available microsurgical and macrosurgical literature. The term pregnancy rate was 45.7% for those who underwent lysis of adhesions, 50.0% among the tubal anastomosis group, and 20.8% among patients treated with a two-stage salpingostomy.
输卵管重建手术的结果必须定期复查。这种方法可以评估个体技术的改进情况，并与其他进行类似手术的结果进行比较。它还能使医生和患者就医生自身手术成功的前景进行有意义的对话。本文介绍了资深作者143例输卵管重建手术的经验。将四种不同的输卵管重建手术结果与现有显微外科和宏观外科文献报道的结果进行比较。粘连松解术患者的妊娠率为45.7%，输卵管吻合术组为50.0%，两阶段输卵管造口术治疗的患者为20.8%。
