• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对卡根概念节奏风险假设的一项考察。

An examination of Kagan's risk hypothesis for conceptual tempo.

作者信息

Buchanan J P

出版信息

Genet Psychol Monogr. 1983 Feb;107(First Half):135-42.

PMID:6840535
Abstract

Third grade children (40 females and 40 males) were first classified with the Matching Familiar Figures Test and then were given an Incomplete Figures Test designed to test Kagan's risk hypothesis for conceptual tempo. In the latter test, the children were shown sets of line drawings in which each successive drawing in a set revealed progressively more of the given object. They were required to guess the identity of the object after seeing each drawing by making either a high risk "outloud" guess (scored with feedback) or a low risk "whisper" guess (scored with no feedback). As predicted, reflective children made significantly fewer incorrect outloud guesses and significantly more correct whisper guesses than the impulsive children. This demonstrated that the reflective children followed a more cautious guessing strategy than the impulsive children, which provided support for Kagan's risk hypothesis.

摘要

三年级儿童(40名女性和40名男性)首先通过匹配熟悉图形测试进行分类,然后进行一项不完整图形测试,旨在检验卡根关于概念节奏的风险假设。在后者的测试中,向孩子们展示了几组线条图,其中一组中的每一幅连续的图揭示出给定物体越来越多的部分。要求他们在看到每一幅图后,通过做出高风险的“大声说出”猜测(给出反馈评分)或低风险的“小声说出”猜测(不给出反馈评分)来猜出物体的身份。正如预测的那样,反思型儿童大声说出的错误猜测明显少于冲动型儿童,小声说出的正确猜测明显多于冲动型儿童。这表明反思型儿童比冲动型儿童采用了更谨慎的猜测策略,这为卡根的风险假设提供了支持。

相似文献

1
An examination of Kagan's risk hypothesis for conceptual tempo.对卡根概念节奏风险假设的一项考察。
Genet Psychol Monogr. 1983 Feb;107(First Half):135-42.
2
Reflection-impulsivity and the evaluation process.反射冲动性与评估过程。
Child Dev. 1979 Dec;50(4):1043-9.
3
The relation of conceptual tempo to aggression and its control.概念节奏与攻击性及其控制的关系。
Child Dev. 1979 Sep;50(3):758-66.
4
A review of the research on reflection and impulsivity in children.
Genet Psychol Monogr. 1982 Nov;106(Second Half):217-37.
5
Emotionality as a moderator of cognitive style on the Matching Familiar Figures Test in adults.成人在匹配熟悉图形测验中,情绪性作为认知风格的调节因素。
J Pers Assess. 1988 Fall;52(3):506-11. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5203_12.
6
Is the matching familiar figures test a measure of cognitive style? A warning for users.匹配熟悉图形测试是认知风格的一种度量方式吗?给使用者的一个警示。
Percept Mot Skills. 1987 Feb;64(1):59-74. doi: 10.2466/pms.1987.64.1.59.
7
The Porteus Maze Test in the measurement of reflection/impulsivity.用于测量反应性/冲动性的波特斯迷宫测验。
Percept Mot Skills. 1982 Jun;54(3 Pt 2):1043-52. doi: 10.2466/pms.1982.54.3c.1043.
8
What ever happened to the norms for the Matching Familiar Figures Test?匹配熟悉图形测验的常模到底怎么了?
Percept Mot Skills. 1986 Dec;63(3):1235-42. doi: 10.2466/pms.1986.63.3.1235.
9
Far generalization of visual analogies strategies by impulsive and reflective EMR students.
Am J Ment Defic. 1983 Nov;88(3):297-306.
10
Reflective and impulsive children: strategies of information processing underlying differences in problem solving.
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1976;41(5):1-59.