• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可减税的酒精饮品:公共卫生政策与预防策略问题

Tax-deductible alcohol: an issue of public health policy and prevention strategy.

作者信息

Mosher J F

出版信息

J Health Polit Policy Law. 1983 Winter;7(4):855-88. doi: 10.1215/03616878-7-4-855.

DOI:10.1215/03616878-7-4-855
PMID:6841939
Abstract

In 1982 U.S. businesses will spend over $10 billion (12 percent of the total retail alcohol market) on alcoholic beverages which will be consumed by top executives, professionals, and other white-collar employees in a variety of business and personal settings. The Internal Revenue Service, through a series of vaguely defined tax deduction categories, permits these expenditures to be deducted from corporate and individual taxes as "ordinary and necessary" to the conduct of business, costing U.S. taxpayers between $3 and $5 billion annually in lost tax receipts. This article examines the scope and legal underpinnings of the IRS tax expenditure policy; its impact on drinking habits and drinking problems among the nation's business and professional elite; the arguments for permitting the subsidization of corporate drinking habits; reform measures that are available to policymakers; and the barriers to effective implementation.

摘要

1982年,美国企业将在酒精饮料上花费超过100亿美元(占零售酒精市场总额的12%),这些饮料将由高级管理人员、专业人士和其他白领员工在各种商务和个人场合饮用。美国国税局通过一系列定义模糊的税收扣除类别,允许这些支出作为开展业务的“正常和必要”费用从公司税和个人税中扣除,每年使美国纳税人损失30亿至50亿美元的税收收入。本文探讨了美国国税局税收支出政策的范围和法律依据;其对美国商业和专业精英饮酒习惯及饮酒问题的影响;支持补贴企业饮酒习惯的论点;政策制定者可用的改革措施;以及有效实施的障碍。

相似文献

1
Tax-deductible alcohol: an issue of public health policy and prevention strategy.可减税的酒精饮品:公共卫生政策与预防策略问题
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1983 Winter;7(4):855-88. doi: 10.1215/03616878-7-4-855.
2
Federal tax law and public health policy: a case of alcohol-related tax expenditures.联邦税法与公共卫生政策:以酒精相关税收支出为例。
J Public Health Policy. 1982 Sep;3(3):260-83.
3
Motor vehicle safety, health care, and taxes. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.机动车安全、医疗保健与税收。美国运输部国家公路交通安全管理局。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 1994 Jan-Mar;9(1):11-23.
4
Policy options for prevention: the case of alcohol.预防的政策选择:以酒精为例。
J Public Health Policy. 1999;20(2):192-213.
5
The relationship between alcohol taxes and binge drinking: evaluating new tax measures incorporating multiple tax and beverage types.酒精税与暴饮之间的关系:评估纳入多种税种和饮料类型的新税收措施。
Addiction. 2015 Mar;110(3):441-50. doi: 10.1111/add.12818. Epub 2014 Dec 28.
6
Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study.美国加利福尼亚州伯克利市对含糖饮料征税一年后价格、销量、消费者支出及饮料消费的变化:一项前后对照研究
PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 18;14(4):e1002283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002283. eCollection 2017 Apr.
7
[On alcoholic beverage taxation in Spain].[关于西班牙的酒精饮料税收]
Gac Sanit. 2018 Mar-Apr;32(2):176-180. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.10.017. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
8
Competing with big business: a randomised experiment testing the effects of messages to promote alcohol and sugary drink control policy.与大企业竞争:一项测试促进酒精和含糖饮料控制政策信息效果的随机实验。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Dec 28;17(1):945. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4972-6.
9
Prevention of deaths from harmful drinking in the United States: the potential effects of tax increases and advertising bans on young drinkers.预防美国有害饮酒导致的死亡:提高税收和禁止广告对年轻饮酒者的潜在影响。
J Stud Alcohol. 2006 Mar;67(2):300-8. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2006.67.300.
10
[Economic issues and public alcohol abuse prevention policies in France].[法国的经济问题与公共酒精滥用预防政策]
Sante Publique. 2016 Oct 19;28(4):461-470.

引用本文的文献

1
Food Service Employee Alcohol Use, Hangovers and Norms During and After Work Hours.食品服务员工在工作时间内外的酒精使用、宿醉及规范。
J Subst Use. 2012;17(3):269-276. doi: 10.3109/14659891.2011.580414. Epub 2011 Oct 3.