Suppr超能文献

钝性创伤后血尿:肾盂造影何时有用?

Hematuria after blunt trauma: when is pyelography useful?

作者信息

Guice K, Oldham K, Eide B, Johansen K

出版信息

J Trauma. 1983 Apr;23(4):305-11.

PMID:6842633
Abstract

Blood in the urine is common following blunt abdominal trauma. Most trauma centers routinely perform limited intravenous pyelography (IVP), usually with cystography, in such individuals presenting with any degree of hematuria in order to identify urinary tract injury. The observation that the yield of positive IVPs is small among such individuals, and the suspicion that a positive IVP rarely leads to a substantive change in outcome, resulted in the following retrospective study. We reviewed our Trauma Center's records for all patients undergoing IVP following blunt trauma in a 1-year period. Virtually all individuals had a cystogram performed. Positive studies were defined by various kidney, ureteral, bladder, or urethral abnormalities; bladder deviation by extrinsic pelvic hematoma was not counted as a positive finding. Among 156 patients undergoing IVP for hematuria in this period, 13 (8.3%) had an abnormal IVP or cystogram. Of these 13 patients ten (77%) had either gross or 4+ hematuria. Five patients (3%) required further diagnostic or therapeutic intervention. One patient (0.6%) required nephrectomy when exploration revealed renal artery thrombosis causing irreversible kidney ischemia. All five patients who required further evaluation or therapy presented with gross or 4+ hematuria. Had screening IVP been performed only in blunt trauma victims presenting with gross or 4+ hematuria, no patients with significant urinary tract injury would have been missed, and 119 (75%) of the patients in this series would have been spared the expenditure of time and money, and the radiation and dye exposure, resulting from their negative studies. Individuals in whom the possibility of renal injury is high following blunt trauma (flank pain or hematoma, low rib fractures) should undergo rapid limited IVP for diagnosis of significant genitourinary tract injury. Such evaluation should also be carried out in asymptomatic individuals who present with gross or 4+ hematuria. Microscopic hematuria alone, however, is a poor predictor of significant genitourinary tract damage. Our review suggests that asymptomatic victims of blunt trauma who have only small amounts of blood in the urine may safely be observed without routine emergency IVP.

摘要

腹部钝性创伤后血尿很常见。大多数创伤中心通常会对出现任何程度血尿的此类患者常规进行有限的静脉肾盂造影(IVP),通常还会进行膀胱造影,以确定尿路损伤。鉴于此类患者中IVP阳性的检出率较低,且怀疑IVP阳性很少会导致治疗结果发生实质性改变,因此进行了以下回顾性研究。我们查阅了创伤中心在1年期间对所有钝性创伤后接受IVP检查的患者的记录。几乎所有患者都进行了膀胱造影。阳性检查结果定义为各种肾脏、输尿管、膀胱或尿道异常;盆腔外血肿导致的膀胱移位不算作阳性发现。在此期间接受IVP检查以评估血尿的156例患者中,13例(8.3%)IVP或膀胱造影异常。在这13例患者中,10例(77%)有肉眼血尿或4+血尿。5例患者(3%)需要进一步的诊断或治疗干预。1例患者(0.6%)在探查发现肾动脉血栓形成导致不可逆的肾缺血时需要进行肾切除术。所有5例需要进一步评估或治疗的患者均有肉眼血尿或4+血尿。如果仅对出现肉眼血尿或4+血尿的钝性创伤受害者进行筛查IVP,本系列中不会漏诊任何有严重尿路损伤的患者,并且119例(75%)患者可避免因检查结果为阴性而花费时间和金钱,以及遭受辐射和染料暴露。钝性创伤后肾损伤可能性较高的患者(胁腹疼痛或血肿、低位肋骨骨折)应进行快速有限的IVP以诊断严重的泌尿生殖道损伤。对于出现肉眼血尿或4+血尿的无症状患者也应进行此类评估。然而,单纯镜下血尿对严重泌尿生殖道损伤的预测价值不大。我们的回顾表明,钝性创伤后仅出现少量血尿的无症状受害者可安全地进行观察,无需常规急诊IVP。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验