• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

合并髂动脉和股浅动脉闭塞患者的主髂动脉重建术。

Aortoiliac reconstruction in patients with combined iliac and superficial femoral arterial occlusion.

作者信息

Sumner D S, Strandness D E

出版信息

Surgery. 1978 Sep;84(3):348-55.

PMID:684626
Abstract

Despite revascularization of the common femoral--profunda femoris system, many patients fail to obtain satisfactory relief from claudication or rest pain. Clinical observations were compared with objective physiological data in 54 technically successful aortoiliofemoral reconstructions for multilevel disease. Nine of 28 operations (32%) for claudication and five of 26 operations (19%) for ischemia at rest had poor results. While the average ankle pressure index (API = ankle blood pressure/arm blood pressure) rose from 0.52 +/- 0.03 (SEM) to 0.81 +/- 0.03 in limbs treated successfully for claudication, it changed insignificantly in those with an unsuccessful result (0.58 +/- 0.04 to 0.61 +/- 0.04). When ischemic symptoms were relieved, API rose from 0.23 +/- 0.04 to 0.55 +/- 0.03 but increased only from 0.22 +/- 0.09 to 0.40 +/- 0.02 in limbs with insufficient improvement. Preoperative thigh pressure index (TPI) in claudicating limbs with poor results (0.96 +/- 0.05) differed little from that in limbs with good results (0.92 +/- 0.05); nor was the TPI of ischemic limbs with poor results (0.83 +/- 0.13) significantly greater than that in limbs with good results (0.60 +/- 0.05). Neither the TPI nor the thigh to ankle pressure gradient was of value in predicting which extremities would respond poorly to aortoiliofemoral reconstruction.

摘要

尽管股总动脉-股深动脉系统已实现血管重建,但许多患者的间歇性跛行或静息痛并未得到满意缓解。对54例技术成功的主动脉-髂股动脉重建术治疗多节段疾病的患者,将临床观察结果与客观生理数据进行了比较。28例治疗间歇性跛行的手术中有9例(32%)效果不佳,26例治疗静息缺血的手术中有5例(19%)效果不佳。对于成功治疗间歇性跛行的肢体,平均踝压指数(API = 踝部血压/臂部血压)从0.52±0.03(标准误)升至0.81±0.03,而效果不佳的肢体变化不显著(从0.58±0.04升至0.61±0.04)。当缺血症状得到缓解时,API从0.23±0.04升至0.55±0.03,但改善不足的肢体仅从0.22±0.09升至0.40±0.02。效果不佳的间歇性跛行肢体术前大腿压指数(TPI)(0.96±0.05)与效果良好的肢体(0.92±0.05)差异不大;效果不佳的缺血肢体的TPI(0.83±0.13)也未显著高于效果良好的肢体(0.60±0.05)。TPI和大腿至踝部的压力梯度在预测哪些肢体对主动脉-髂股动脉重建反应不佳方面均无价值。

相似文献

1
Aortoiliac reconstruction in patients with combined iliac and superficial femoral arterial occlusion.合并髂动脉和股浅动脉闭塞患者的主髂动脉重建术。
Surgery. 1978 Sep;84(3):348-55.
2
Thoracic aorta as source of inflow in reoperation for occluded aortoiliac reconstruction.胸主动脉作为闭塞性主-髂动脉重建再手术的流入道来源。
Surgery. 1986 Oct;100(4):635-45.
3
[Predicting the results of revascularization of the extremities through the deep femoral artery].[通过股深动脉预测肢体血管重建的结果]
Vestn Khir Im I I Grek. 1986 Apr;136(4):50-5.
4
[Isolated proximal revascularization for double aorto-iliac and femoral lesions].[孤立性近端血管重建术治疗双主动脉-髂动脉及股动脉病变]
J Chir (Paris). 1991 Nov;128(11):459-64.
5
The role of profunda femoris revascularization in aortofemoral surgery. An analysis of factors affecting graft patency.
Int Angiol. 1997 Jun;16(2):107-13.
6
[Factors determining late patency of aortobifemoral bypass graft].[决定主-双股动脉旁路移植术远期通畅率的因素]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1997 Jan-Feb;125(1-2):24-35.
7
[Value of profunda revascularization in aorto-femoral 2-level occlusion].
Vasa Suppl. 1989;27:318-9.
8
Chronic atherosclerotic occlusion of the lower limbs treated by direct arterial surgery. A review of 70 cases.直接动脉手术治疗下肢慢性动脉粥样硬化闭塞症:70例回顾性研究
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1971 Nov;16(6):356-63.
9
[Reconstructive surgery in arterial disease of the legs at the stage of intermittent claudication. Report of 100 cases (author's transl)].间歇性跛行阶段下肢动脉疾病的重建手术。100例报告(作者译)
J Chir (Paris). 1979 Jun-Jul;116(6-7):419-22.
10
Aortoiliofemoral atherosclerotic occlusive disease: comparative results of endarterectomy and Dacron bypass grafts.主-髂-股动脉粥样硬化闭塞性疾病:动脉内膜切除术与涤纶旁路移植术的对比结果
Surgery. 1971 Dec;70(6):974-84.

引用本文的文献

1
Limb-threatening ischemia due to multilevel arterial occlusive disease. Simultaneous or staged inflow/outflow revascularization.由于多节段动脉闭塞性疾病导致的肢体威胁性缺血。同期或分期进行流入/流出道血管重建术。
Ann Surg. 1995 May;221(5):498-503; discussion 503-6. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199505000-00007.
2
Toe pulse reappearance time in prediction of aortofemoral bypass success.足背动脉搏动重现时间对主-股动脉旁路移植术成功的预测价值
Ann Surg. 1981 Feb;193(2):201-5. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198102000-00013.
3
Recognition and surgical management of patent but hemodynamically failed arterial grafts.
通畅但血流动力学功能衰竭的动脉移植物的识别与外科处理
Ann Surg. 1981 Apr;193(4):467-76. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198104000-00012.
4
Popliteal artery puncture in the assessment of patients with severe leg ischemia.在评估严重下肢缺血患者时进行腘动脉穿刺。
Ann Surg. 1983 Dec;198(6):771-5. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198312000-00017.
5
Pelvic hemodynamics before and after aortoiliac vascular reconstruction: the significance of penile blood pressure.主髂血管重建前后的盆腔血流动力学:阴茎血压的意义
Jpn J Surg. 1988 Sep;18(5):514-20. doi: 10.1007/BF02471484.
6
Long-term results of combined iliac balloon angioplasty and distal surgical revascularization.髂动脉球囊血管成形术与远端手术血管重建联合治疗的长期结果
Ann Surg. 1989 Sep;210(3):324-30; discussion 331. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198909000-00008.