Wulsin L R, Bursztajn H, Gutheil T G
Am J Psychiatry. 1983 May;140(5):601-3. doi: 10.1176/ajp.140.5.601.
The authors present a case report and discuss the clinical effects of the Tarasoff decision on the therapy of a potentially violent patient. They emphasize that the patient's ambivalence toward the intended victim can be used to foster the therapeutic alliance. The therapist's legal duty to the victim and therapeutic duty to the patient, they assert, can then be synergistically applied with an unexpected benefit: the patient's capacity to make choices is enhanced.
作者呈现了一份病例报告，并讨论了塔萨夫裁决对一名潜在暴力患者治疗的临床影响。他们强调，患者对预期受害者的矛盾心理可用于促进治疗联盟。他们断言，治疗师对受害者的法律责任和对患者的治疗责任，随后可协同应用并带来意想不到的好处：增强患者做出选择的能力。
