Cohen M M
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1983 Apr;54(4):338-42.
Five volunteer subjects were tested for acceleration tolerance under eight different experimental conditions representing relaxed and unprotected tolerance and tolerance with all possible combinations of the Anti-G suit, the M-1 maneuver, and supination in a PALE seat. The individual and combined effects of the various acceleration protective techniques were examined as they related to various models for acceleration protection, and the data revealed no statistically significant deviations from a simple additive model. The apparent net additivity was interpreted as resulting from a combination of additive, synergistic, and overlapping mechanisms.
五名志愿者受试者在八种不同的实验条件下接受了加速度耐力测试，这些条件代表了放松且无保护状态下的耐力，以及在PALE座椅中使用抗荷服、M-1动作和旋前的所有可能组合时的耐力。研究了各种加速度防护技术的个体和综合效果，以及它们与各种加速度防护模型的关系，数据显示与简单相加模型相比没有统计学上的显著偏差。明显的净相加性被解释为是由相加、协同和重叠机制共同作用的结果。
