Miller B D, Thames M D, Mark A L
J Clin Invest. 1983 May;71(5):1247-53. doi: 10.1172/jci110874.
The antiarrhythmic action of lidocaine has been attributed solely to its direct electrophysiological effects on the heart. However, lidocaine is particularly effective in treating ventricular arrhythmias associated with increased sympathetic activity, e.g., in myocardial infarction and digitalis toxicity. We tested the hypothesis that lidocaine administered intravenously depressed cardiac sympathetic nerve activity (CSNA). We measured CSNA in six dogs in control state and after lidocaine in doses of 0.625, 1.25, and 2.5 mg/kg i.v. over 2 min. These doses of lidocaine produced graded decreases of CSNA of -8 +/- 2, -18 +/- 1, and -41 +/- 5%, respectively (P less than 0.05, mean +/- SE). In six additional experiments the bolus of lidocaine was followed by an infusion for 20 min (1.25 mg/kg followed by 100 micrograms/kg per min and 2.5 mg/kg followed by 200 micrograms/kg per min). Infusion of lidocaine maintained depression of CSNA at a level that was 23 +/- 3 and 35 +/- 5% less than control (P less than 0.05), respectively, at plasma lidocaine levels of 5.2 +/- 0.6 and 7.5 +/- 1.4 micrograms/ml, respectively. CSNA returned to control during recovery periods. CSNA did not decrease with the passage of time or administration of vehicle. In five dogs with vagi intact, carotid sinuses isolated and held at a pressure of 100 mmHg, and aortic baroreceptors denervated, administration of lidocaine (2.5 mg/kg followed by 200 micrograms/kg per min) decreased renal nerve activity to 71 +/- 8% of control. Increases in left ventricular systolic pressure and maximum derivative of pressure with respect to time (dP/dtmax) resulting from electrical stimulation of preganglionic sympathetic nerves were not significantly altered by lidocaine, but were markedly attenuated by hexamethonium, a ganglionic blocker. In conclusion, lidocaine administered intravenously produces dose-dependent and sustained decreases in cardiac sympathetic nerve activity. These decreases can occur with therapeutic plasma levels. We speculate that this effect is due to central nervous system effects of the drug and that this effect may contribute to the antiarrhythmic actions of lidocaine.
利多卡因的抗心律失常作用一直被认为完全归因于其对心脏的直接电生理效应。然而,利多卡因在治疗与交感神经活动增强相关的室性心律失常方面特别有效,例如在心肌梗死和洋地黄中毒时。我们测试了静脉注射利多卡因会降低心脏交感神经活动(CSNA)这一假设。我们在六只处于对照状态的狗以及静脉注射剂量分别为0.625、1.25和2.5mg/kg的利多卡因后2分钟测量了CSNA。这些剂量的利多卡因分别使CSNA分级降低了-8±2%、-18±1%和-41±5%(P<0.05,平均值±标准误)。在另外六个实验中,静脉推注利多卡因后接着输注20分钟(1.25mg/kg后接着以100μg/kg每分钟输注,2.5mg/kg后接着以200μg/kg每分钟输注)。在血浆利多卡因水平分别为5.2±0.6和7.5±1.4μg/ml时,输注利多卡因使CSNA维持在比对照水平分别低23±3%和35±5%的水平(P<0.05)。在恢复期CSNA恢复到对照水平。CSNA不会随着时间推移或给予溶媒而降低。在五只迷走神经完整、分离颈动脉窦并使其维持在100mmHg压力且主动脉压力感受器去神经支配的狗中,给予利多卡因(2.5mg/kg后接着以200μg/kg每分钟输注)使肾神经活动降低至对照的71±8%。由节前交感神经电刺激引起的左心室收缩压和压力相对于时间的最大变化率(dP/dtmax)增加并未被利多卡因显著改变,但被神经节阻滞剂六甲铵显著减弱。总之,静脉注射利多卡因会使心脏交感神经活动产生剂量依赖性和持续性降低。这些降低可在治疗性血浆水平时出现。我们推测这种效应是由于该药物的中枢神经系统效应,并且这种效应可能有助于利多卡因的抗心律失常作用。