Buño W, Bustamante J, Fuentes J
J Neurobiol. 1983 May;14(3):177-94. doi: 10.1002/neu.480140303.
To investigate whether static and dynamic sensitivities of slowly and rapidly adapting stretch receptor organs (SAO and RAO, respectively) or crayfish are different when perturbed compared with those in conventional laboratory experiments, receptors were submitted to ramplike length changes of different velocities separated by long-duration, constant lengths of different values. They were perturbed at random by fast, small-amplitude length variations called "jitter." First-order afferent discharges were recorded extracellularly. Quantifications involved the separate estimation of static and dynamic response components. In the SAO, jitter (1) augmented the static sensitivity, (2) decreased the dynamic sensitivity, (3) simplified response profiles by decreasing nonlinearities and increasing transduction fidelity in terms of coding length. In the RAO, jitter (1) changed the behavior from phasic to tonic with length sensitivity, (2) decreased the dynamic sensitivity to values close to those of the unperturbed SAO, (3) increased transduction fidelity for stimulus length and decreased nonlinearities. Perturbation effects suggest that differences between SAO and RAO are more quantitative than qualitative. Moreover, they have general implications and are relevant to other mechanoreceptors at other levels in the CNS.
为了研究小龙虾的慢适应和快适应牵张感受器器官(分别为SAO和RAO)在受到扰动时的静态和动态敏感性是否与传统实验室实验中的不同,感受器被施加不同速度的斜坡状长度变化,中间间隔不同值的长时间恒定长度。它们会被快速、小幅度的长度变化(称为“抖动”)随机扰动。细胞外记录一级传入放电。量化涉及对静态和动态反应成分的单独估计。在SAO中,抖动(1)增强了静态敏感性,(2)降低了动态敏感性,(3)通过减少非线性和增加编码长度方面的转导保真度来简化反应曲线。在RAO中,抖动(1)使长度敏感性的行为从相位性变为紧张性,(2)将动态敏感性降低到接近未受扰动的SAO的值,(3)增加了对刺激长度的转导保真度并减少了非线性。扰动效应表明,SAO和RAO之间的差异更多是定量的而非定性的。此外,它们具有普遍意义,并且与中枢神经系统其他水平的其他机械感受器相关。