Beardmore J A, Karimi-Booshehri F
Nature. 1983;303(5917):522-4. doi: 10.1038/303522a0.
No direct evidence is available concerning what average genetic differences, if any, characterize the segments of socially stratified human populations, although theoretical considerations suggest that genetic differentiation within such populations is to be expected. We have now analysed two large samples of data from blood donors in England to test whether the distributions of the ABO and Rhesus blood group phenotypes are random with respect to socio-economic groups as determined by occupational classification. We have found that in both native and migrant sections of the populations of two widely separated regions (south-west England and part of Yorkshire) and in both sexes, the A phenotype is highly significantly more, and the O phenotype significantly less, frequent than expected in social classes I and II, while the converse is seen in social classes III-V. An individual of the A phenotype has thus about 15% greater probability than chance would dictate of being placed in classes I and II. The distribution of the Rh+ and Rh- phenotypes does not differ significantly between classes. It seems unlikely that this nonrandom distribution of the ABO phenotypes among socio-economic groups results from sampling, historical or migrational effects and we conclude that the observed association is likely to result from pleiotropic effects of the ABO alleles (or genes closely linked to them) on attributes influencing occupational type, social mobility and social class.
目前尚无直接证据表明社会分层的人类群体各阶层之间存在何种平均遗传差异(若存在差异的话),尽管理论思考表明这类群体内部的遗传分化是可以预期的。我们现在分析了来自英格兰献血者的两个大型数据样本,以检验ABO血型和恒河猴血型表型的分布相对于由职业分类确定的社会经济群体而言是否随机。我们发现,在两个相距甚远的地区(英格兰西南部和约克郡部分地区)的本地和移民人群中,无论男女,A血型表型在社会阶层I和II中的出现频率都显著高于预期,而O血型表型则显著低于预期,而在社会阶层III - V中情况则相反。因此,具有A血型表型的个体被归入阶层I和II的概率比随机概率高出约15%。Rh +和Rh -表型在各阶层之间的分布没有显著差异。ABO血型表型在社会经济群体中的这种非随机分布似乎不太可能是由抽样、历史或迁移效应导致的,我们得出结论,观察到的关联可能是由于ABO等位基因(或与其紧密连锁的基因)对影响职业类型、社会流动性和社会阶层的属性产生的多效性效应所致。