Currier D P, Mann R
Phys Ther. 1983 Jun;63(6):915-21. doi: 10.1093/ptj/63.6.915.
The effects of electrical stimulation and its comparison with various resistance training modes were investigated in 34 subjects who trained their dominant leg isometrically three times a week for five weeks. Group E (n = 8) used maximum voluntary isometric contractions only, Group S (n = 8) received only electrical stimulation, and Group ES (n = 9) trained using a concurrent combination of isometric exercise and electrical stimulation. In addition, Group C (n = 9), a control group, did no experimental training. The expected gain in torque was shown in the isometric strength scores of the three experimental groups; however, there was little change in the isometric strength of the control group and in the isokinetic (100, 200, and 300 degrees/sec) results of any of the four groups. After adjustments were made for pretest strength results, a one-way analysis of covariance indicated that the posttest isometric strength scores of the three experimental groups differed significantly from those of the control group. No other posttest differences were found among any of the other training modes.
对34名受试者进行了电刺激的效果及其与各种阻力训练模式的比较研究。这些受试者每周对其优势腿进行三次等长训练，持续五周。E组（n = 8）仅采用最大自主等长收缩，S组（n = 8）仅接受电刺激，ES组（n = 9）采用等长运动和电刺激的联合训练。此外，C组（n = 9）作为对照组，未进行实验性训练。三个实验组的等长力量得分显示出预期的扭矩增加；然而，对照组的等长力量以及四组中任何一组的等速（100、200和300度/秒）结果几乎没有变化。在对预测试力量结果进行调整后，单向协方差分析表明，三个实验组的测试后等长力量得分与对照组有显著差异。在其他任何训练模式之间未发现其他测试后差异。
