Lewin B
Adolescence. 1983 Spring;18(69):159-68.
Using data from a representative sample of adolescents in grade ten in Uppsala, the fourth largest city in Sweden, attitudes toward a number of (criminal) sexual acts are studied. These data are contrasted with those from a sample of patients at a school gynecological clinic. It is found that for both samples, only a very limited number of the eight discussed acts are considered to be criminal by the adolescents. Although at least seven or eight acts are criminal in Swedish law, only two acts are considered criminal by about half of the respondents. These acts are pedophilia and rape after petting. The same questions were used by Kutchinsky in 1969 when on behalf of the U.S. Congress Commission on Obscenity and Pornography he studied inhabitants in Copenhagen, Denmark. When comparing data from Uppsala Sweden 1978 with data from Copenhagen, Denmark 1969 we find that Swedish adolescents in the late seventies, on the whole are much less likely to call the discussed acts criminal. The only exception is rape after petting, which in Copenhagen in the late sixties was the act least often seen as criminal but in the Uppsala study in the late seventies it was one of the two acts most often claimed to be criminal. Finally, the effects of coital experience and the effect of sexual knowledge on the percieved criminality of the acts are considered.
利用瑞典第四大城市乌普萨拉十年级青少年的代表性样本数据,研究了他们对一系列(犯罪)性行为的态度。这些数据与一所学校妇科诊所的患者样本数据进行了对比。研究发现,对于两个样本而言,在青少年认为属于犯罪的八项所讨论行为中,只有极少数行为被认定为犯罪。尽管瑞典法律规定至少有七八种行为属于犯罪,但只有约一半的受访者认为其中两种行为是犯罪。这些行为是恋童癖和抚摸后强奸。1969年,库钦斯基代表美国国会淫秽与色情制品委员会研究丹麦哥本哈根的居民时,使用了相同的问题。当比较1978年瑞典乌普萨拉的数据与1969年丹麦哥本哈根的数据时,我们发现70年代末的瑞典青少年总体上不太可能将所讨论的行为称为犯罪。唯一的例外是抚摸后强奸,在60年代末的哥本哈根,这是最不常被视为犯罪的行为,但在70年代末的乌普萨拉研究中,它是最常被声称属于犯罪的两种行为之一。最后,考虑了性交经历的影响以及性知识对行为可感知犯罪性的影响。