Hughes M, Sussman H M
Brain Lang. 1983 May;19(1):48-64. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(83)90055-x.
A time-sharing paradigm was used to assess language lateralization in language-disordered and normal children aged 4-7 years. Several expressive language tasks as well as a vocal, but nonlinguistic, task were administered concurrently with unimanual finger tapping. Dependent variables were percent disruption scores and number of syllables produced per concurrent trial. All language concurrent tasks produced tapping reductions for both hands for both groups. This result contrasts to similar time-sharing studies claiming asymmetrical interference and hence language lateralization in children (N. White & M. Kinsbourne, 1980, Brain and Language 10, 215-223; J. Obrzut, G. Hynd, A. Obrzut, & J. Leitgeb, 1980, Brain and Language 11, 181-194). A multiple regression analysis revealed a significant interaction effect differentiating language-disordered from normal children. Normals exhibited a parallel response pattern for speech and tapping (both increased or decreased in rate) under all lateralization conditions. Language-disordered children exhibited an inverse response pattern (e.g., if speech output increased, tapping rate decreased) only under left-hemisphere time-sharing.
采用分时范式评估4至7岁语言障碍儿童和正常儿童的语言侧化情况。在单手手指敲击的同时,并行进行了多项表达性语言任务以及一项发声但非语言的任务。因变量为干扰分数百分比和每次并行试验产生的音节数。所有语言并行任务均使两组儿童双手的敲击次数减少。这一结果与类似的分时研究结果形成对比,那些研究声称存在不对称干扰,从而表明儿童存在语言侧化现象(N. 怀特和M. 金斯伯恩,1980年,《大脑与语言》第10卷,215 - 223页;J. 奥布祖特、G. 海因德、A. 奥布祖特和J. 莱特格布,1980年,《大脑与语言》第11卷,181 - 194页)。多元回归分析显示,存在显著的交互效应,可区分语言障碍儿童和正常儿童。正常儿童在所有侧化条件下,言语和敲击表现出平行的反应模式(速率均增加或均降低)。语言障碍儿童仅在左半球分时条件下表现出相反的反应模式(例如,如果言语输出增加,敲击速率降低)。