Concordance and discordance of drug responses in atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia.

Whether the results of some drug studies could be used to predict the results of other drug studies was examined during serial electrophysiologic drug testing in patients with sustained atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia. The drugs studied were intravenous propranolol, 0.1 mg/kg; intravenous ouabain, 0.01 mg/kg; the combination of propranolol plus ouabain; intravenous procainamide, 0.75 to 1.5 g; oral quinidine, 1.2 to 2.4 g/day; and oral disopyramide, 0.8 to 1.6 g/day. Response was inability to induce sustained tachycardia after administration of a drug. Responses due to increased anterograde limb refractoriness. Six of 10 patients with response to propranolol plus ouabain versus 0 of 9 patients without response to this combination had response to propranolol alone (p less than 0.01). Seven of 14 patients with response to the combination versus 0 of 9 patients without response to the combination had response to ouabain alone (p less than 0.05). Responses due to increased retrograde limb refractoriness. Eight of 9 patients with response to procainamide versus 2 of 17 patients without response to this drug had response to quinidine (p less than 0.01). There was not a significant relation between response to procainamide and response to disopyramide, or between response to quinidine and response to disopyramide. Anterograde limb versus retrograde limb. There was not a significant relation between response to propranolol plus ouabain and response to any class I drug. In conclusion, there are relations between drug responses during electrophysiologic studies in patients with atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia. Thus, it should be possible to simplify these studies.