Hoyt M F, Xenakis S N, Marmar C R, Horowitz M J
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1983 Jul;171(7):400-4. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198307000-00002.
Psychotherapists' and an independent observer's ratings of the "good" to "poor" quality of therapy sessions were correlated with their ratings of various therapist actions. As predicted, significant positive correlations were obtained between the goodness ratings and the emphasis given by therapists to actions encouraging patients' expression of thoughts and feelings and the exploration of their reactions. For a number of other actions, however, therapists and the independent observer disagreed about whether emphasis of the actions correlated with "good" or "poor" sessions. Some possible causes and implications of these differences are discussed.
心理治疗师和一位独立观察者对治疗疗程“良好”到“不佳”质量的评分，与他们对治疗师各种行为的评分相关。正如所预测的那样，在治疗质量评分与治疗师对鼓励患者表达想法和感受以及探索其反应的行为的重视程度之间，获得了显著的正相关。然而，对于许多其他行为，治疗师和独立观察者在这些行为的重视程度与“良好”或“不佳”疗程是否相关这一问题上存在分歧。本文讨论了这些差异的一些可能原因及影响。
