Suppr超能文献

[用于确定听力损失百分比的不同图表的比较]

[Comparison of different charts for determining the percentage of hearing loss].

作者信息

Tymnik G, Kessler L, Koch R

出版信息

Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1983 Apr;62(4):157-9.

PMID:6865607
Abstract

Different methods are being employed at present to determine the percentage of hearing loss, on the basis of speech-and-tone audiometry. We scrutinized 1000 expertises on noise, and we were able to show the comparative mutual relationships between the methods employed, on the basis of regression analysis. The methods according to Trautmann/Oeken were relatively better than the other methods, but none of these methods yielded optimal relations.

摘要

目前正在采用不同的方法,基于言语和纯音听力测定来确定听力损失的百分比。我们仔细审查了1000份关于噪声的专业鉴定书,并能够基于回归分析展示所采用方法之间的比较相互关系。根据特劳特曼/厄肯的方法相对比其他方法更好,但这些方法中没有一种能产生最佳关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验