• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[前列腺癌的伽马远距离治疗方法]

[Method of gamma teletherapy in prostatic cancer].

作者信息

Aliev B M, Tkachev S I, Filippiuk V V

出版信息

Med Radiol (Mosk). 1983 Jun;28(6):25-30.

PMID:6865682
Abstract

Three variants of gamma-beam therapy of prostatic cancer were worked out on the basis of a thorough topometric preparation, an analysis of dose distributions using computer, and taking account of tumor dissemination. It has been shown that moving one- or two-field gamma-beam therapy is indicated in cases when tumor lies within the limits of the prostate only. When it affects regional lymph nodes the combination of moving gamma-beam therapy with static 4-field cross irradiation with the ratio of doses from the front and back fields 2:1 is recommended. When tumor involves the nearest lymphatic collectors gamma-beam therapy is supplemented by estrogens with stage-by-stage irradiation of primary tumor, regional lymph nodes (by the above schemes) and the paraaortal group of lymph nodes from 2 opposite shaped fields, a focal dose to these nodes being 30-40 Gy only. The summary focal dose to the regional lymph nodes is 45-50 Gy, to primary tumor 65-70 Gy. The above variants of gamma-beam therapy were used for the treatment of 69 patients with prostatic cancer, Stages II-IV. Not a single patient developed marked reactions and late complications 6-36 mos. after therapy, 61% of the patients lived over 3 yrs.

摘要

在进行精确的拓扑测量准备、利用计算机分析剂量分布并考虑肿瘤扩散情况的基础上,制定了三种前列腺癌伽马射线治疗方案。结果表明,仅当肿瘤局限于前列腺范围内时,才适合采用单野或双野移动伽马射线治疗。当肿瘤累及区域淋巴结时,建议将移动伽马射线治疗与静态四野交叉照射相结合,前后野剂量比为2:1。当肿瘤累及最近的淋巴管时,伽马射线治疗需辅以雌激素,并对原发肿瘤、区域淋巴结(按上述方案)和腹主动脉旁淋巴结组进行分阶段照射,对这些淋巴结的局部剂量仅为30 - 40 Gy。区域淋巴结的总局部剂量为45 - 50 Gy,原发肿瘤为65 - 70 Gy。上述伽马射线治疗方案用于治疗69例II - IV期前列腺癌患者。治疗后6 - 36个月,无一例患者出现明显反应和晚期并发症,61%的患者存活超过3年。

相似文献

1
[Method of gamma teletherapy in prostatic cancer].[前列腺癌的伽马远距离治疗方法]
Med Radiol (Mosk). 1983 Jun;28(6):25-30.
2
[Results of rotational gamma teletherapy of prostatic cancer].
Vopr Onkol. 1982;28(11):73-6.
3
[Results of gamma teletherapy of prostate cancer patients].[前列腺癌患者的伽马远距离治疗结果]
Med Radiol (Mosk). 1983 Nov;28(11):15-20.
4
[Planning combined radiation therapy of rectal cancer taking into account the biological effect of the radiation].[考虑到辐射的生物学效应来规划直肠癌的联合放射治疗]
Med Radiol (Mosk). 1985 Oct;30(10):23-30.
5
[Determination of the field length in planning radioisotope teletherapy].[放射性核素远距离治疗计划中射野长度的测定]
Med Radiol (Mosk). 1988 Sep;33(9):13-6.
6
[Formation of dose fields in local irradiation of cancer of the prostate].[前列腺癌局部照射中剂量场的形成]
Med Radiol (Mosk). 1988 Apr;33(4):63-8.
7
[Comparison of the effectiveness of preoperative radiation and thermoradiation therapy in treating breast cancer].
Med Radiol (Mosk). 1984 Apr;29(4):50-5.
8
Acute genitourinary toxicity after high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: correlation between the urethral dose in HDR brachytherapy and the severity of acute genitourinary toxicity.高剂量率(HDR)近距离放射治疗联合低分割外照射放疗治疗局限性前列腺癌后的急性泌尿生殖系统毒性:HDR近距离放射治疗中尿道剂量与急性泌尿生殖系统毒性严重程度之间的相关性
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Oct 1;63(2):463-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.11.041.
9
[Survival status of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer patients after radiotherapy--a report of 287 cases].[IV期非小细胞肺癌患者放疗后的生存状况——附287例报告]
Ai Zheng. 2006 Nov;25(11):1419-22.
10
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy improves lymph node coverage and dose to critical structures compared with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized prostate cancer.在临床局限性前列腺癌中,与三维适形放疗相比,调强放疗可改善淋巴结覆盖情况及对关键结构的剂量。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Nov 1;66(3):654-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.05.037.