Di Orio M J, Harrington T L
Percept Mot Skills. 1983 Apr;56(2):459-68. doi: 10.2466/pms.1983.56.2.459.
Human thresholds were measured for the detection of angular divergence between straight lines using pairs of line segments. The dependence of these thresholds on temporal separation between the two lines, spatial separation, and retinal locus was assessed. Results were comparable to prior divergence thresholds obtained by Harrington and Harrington in their study of "blur patterns." In blur patterns motion parameters may be processed partly or wholly as form information rather than as motion information per se. Harrington and Harrington had used moderate blurring velocities, for which information on both motion and form were present. Observers may have been responding either to motion or to form. The study reported here used briefly presented two-line "blur patterns" with only form information. Analysis suggested that the form components of fast motion-produced blur patterns could be processed by the human visual system. Neither temporal nor spatial separation was a significant determiner of thresholds in accordance with Harrington and Harrington who found no effect of blur-line density in the range studied. Retinal locus was a factor as it was with blur patterns. Some possible mechanisms for the detection of divergence indicated by these results are discussed.
使用线段对测量了人类检测直线之间角度发散的阈值。评估了这些阈值对两条线之间的时间间隔、空间间隔和视网膜位置的依赖性。结果与哈林顿夫妇在其“模糊模式”研究中获得的先前发散阈值相当。在模糊模式中,运动参数可能部分或全部作为形状信息而非运动信息本身进行处理。哈林顿夫妇使用了中等模糊速度,此时运动和形状信息都存在。观察者可能对运动或形状做出了反应。此处报告的研究使用了仅具有形状信息的短暂呈现的双线“模糊模式”。分析表明,快速运动产生的模糊模式的形状成分可以被人类视觉系统处理。与哈林顿夫妇的研究结果一致,时间和空间间隔都不是阈值的重要决定因素,他们发现在所研究的范围内模糊线密度没有影响。视网膜位置是一个因素,就像在模糊模式中一样。讨论了这些结果表明的一些检测发散的可能机制。