Bladé J, Feliú E, Rozman C, Estapé J, Millá A, Montserrat E
Cancer. 1983 Sep 1;52(5):786-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19830901)52:5<786::aid-cncr2820520505>3.0.co;2-h.
In order to ascertain whether multiple myeloma patients resistant to one alkylating agent would respond to a second one, high-dose intermittent cyclophosphamide was administered to 12 patients showing resistance to melphalan and prednisone. On the other hand, intermittent melphalan and prednisone treatment was employed in eight myeloma patients resistant to intermittent cyclophosphamide. Only one objective response was achieved among 12 patients on cyclophosphamide therapy, in spite of having employed high doses of this alkylating agent. No responses were achieved with melphalan in the group of cyclophosphamide-resistant patients. The median survival probability was 8.7 months (SD +/- 2.9) for all patients after starting the second alkylating agent. These results suggest cross-resistance between melphalan and cyclophosphamide in myeloma. The authors conclude that a single second alkylating agent cannot be recommended as a treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who are truly refractory to one alkylating agent.
为了确定对一种烷化剂耐药的多发性骨髓瘤患者是否会对另一种烷化剂产生反应,对12例对美法仑和泼尼松耐药的患者给予大剂量间歇环磷酰胺治疗。另一方面,对8例对间歇环磷酰胺耐药的骨髓瘤患者采用间歇美法仑和泼尼松治疗。尽管使用了高剂量的这种烷化剂,但在接受环磷酰胺治疗的12例患者中仅获得1例客观缓解。在对环磷酰胺耐药的患者组中,美法仑未取得缓解。开始使用第二种烷化剂后,所有患者的中位生存概率为8.7个月(标准差±2.9)。这些结果提示骨髓瘤中美法仑和环磷酰胺之间存在交叉耐药。作者得出结论,对于真正对一种烷化剂难治的多发性骨髓瘤患者,不推荐使用单一的第二种烷化剂进行治疗。