• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多系统-多方法评估的阐释:还原论与整体论

A clarification of Multisystem-Multimethod assessment: reductionism versus wholism.

作者信息

Peterson G W, Cromwell R E

出版信息

Fam Process. 1983 Jun;22(2):173-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1983.00173.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1983.00173.x
PMID:6873262
Abstract

A clarification and response to a critique of the Multisystem-Multimethod (MS-MM) family assessment is provided in this paper. This approach consists of a logic for integrating family assessment, systems thinking, and clinical interventions. In contrast to the wholistic, or systemic, focus of MS-MM family assessment, the critique of these procedures recommends a more reductionistic approach that contradicts basic elements of systems theory. The critique advocates the isolation and measurement of a few family phenomena, whereas MS-MM assessment recognizes the interdependence among the levels of organization and components of family systems.

摘要

本文对多系统 - 多方法(MS-MM)家庭评估的一项批评进行了澄清与回应。这种方法包含一种整合家庭评估、系统思维和临床干预的逻辑。与MS-MM家庭评估的整体或系统关注点不同,对这些程序的批评推荐了一种更简化的方法,这与系统理论的基本要素相矛盾。该批评主张孤立并测量少数家庭现象,而MS-MM评估认识到家庭系统组织层次和组成部分之间的相互依存关系。

相似文献

1
A clarification of Multisystem-Multimethod assessment: reductionism versus wholism.多系统-多方法评估的阐释:还原论与整体论
Fam Process. 1983 Jun;22(2):173-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1983.00173.x.
2
Sensory extenders versus meters and predictors: clarifying strategies for the use of objective tests in family therapy.感官扩展器与量表及预测指标:澄清家庭治疗中客观测试的使用策略
Fam Process. 1983 Jun;22(2):165-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1983.00165.x.
3
SOME EFFECTS OF COMBINING PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS ON CLINICAL INFERENCES.心理测试组合对临床推断的一些影响
J Consult Psychol. 1964 Oct;28:440-6. doi: 10.1037/h0047724.
4
Personality assessment and test interpretation of Mexican Americans: a critique.墨西哥裔美国人的人格评估与测试解读:一项批判性分析。
J Pers Assess. 1975 Apr;39(2):103-9. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa3902_1.
5
"IMPROVEMENT" IN UNTREATED PSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS.未经治疗的精神病患者的“改善”情况
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1963 Dec;9:575-85. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1963.01720180047007.
6
Multisystem-Multimethod family assessment in clinical contexts.临床环境中的多系统-多方法家庭评估
Fam Process. 1983 Jun;22(2):147-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1983.00147.x.
7
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FAMILIES OF SCHIZOPHRENICS, DELINQUENTS, AND NORMALS.精神分裂症患者、违法者与正常人家庭的比较研究
Psychiatry. 1965 Feb;28:45-9. doi: 10.1080/00332747.1965.11023415.
8
THOUGHT DISORDER AND FAMILY RELATIONS OF SCHIZOPHRENICS. 3. METHODOLOGY USING PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES.精神分裂症患者的思维紊乱与家庭关系。3. 使用投射技术的方法学。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1965 Feb;12:187-200. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1965.01720320075009.
9
The effects of personality tests on state and trait anxiety.人格测试对状态焦虑和特质焦虑的影响。
J Pers Assess. 1974 Feb;38(1):17-20. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1974.10119934.
10
The use of normative data in the psychological evaluation of flying personnel.常模数据在飞行人员心理评估中的应用。
Int Psychiatry Clin. 1967 Winter;4(1):37-51.