Northmore-Ball M D, Dandy D J, Jackson R W
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983 Aug;65(4):400-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.65B4.6874710.
The results of three different types of meniscectomy have been compared in 219 knees, 71 treated by arthroscopic partial meniscectomy, 45 treated by open partial meniscectomy, and 103 treated by open total meniscectomy, with a mean follow-up of 4.3 years. Knees which had undergone previous operations or had other simultaneous operative procedures or ligamentous damage were excluded. Knees with chondromalacia were included provided that this did not amount to frank osteoarthritis. Simple indicators were used for the rate of early recovery from the operation, and the Tapper and Hoover scale was used to record the symptomatic results in the longer term. It was found that knees treated by arthroscopic partial meniscectomy did considerably better than the others by all the criteria used. In most parts of the study there was a clear gradation between the results of the three types of treatment: arthroscopic techniques did better than open operations, and partial meniscectomy did better than total meniscectomy.
对219例膝关节进行了三种不同类型半月板切除术的结果比较,其中71例接受关节镜下部分半月板切除术,45例接受开放性部分半月板切除术,103例接受开放性全半月板切除术,平均随访4.3年。排除曾接受过其他手术或同时进行其他手术操作或有韧带损伤的膝关节。患有软骨软化症的膝关节被纳入研究,前提是尚未发展为明显的骨关节炎。采用简单指标评估术后早期恢复率,并使用塔珀和胡佛量表记录长期症状结果。结果发现,根据所有使用的标准,关节镜下部分半月板切除术治疗的膝关节效果明显优于其他治疗方式。在研究的大部分方面,三种治疗方式的结果存在明显的梯度差异:关节镜技术优于开放手术,部分半月板切除术优于全半月板切除术。