• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

城市实地项目中氨苯砜的依从性

Dapsone compliance in an urban field project.

作者信息

Revankar C R, Naik S S, Ganapati R

出版信息

Lepr India. 1983 Jan;55(1):117-21.

PMID:6876753
Abstract

Available reports both from rural and urban leprosy centres prove beyond any doubt that dapsone is not being consumed regularly by all those who show regular clinic attendance. No reports are available from urban field projects where SET programme is being operated. In this study surprise urine samples of 294 patients of all types (smear positive 53%) mainly on dapsone monotherapy attending (1) leprosy treatment centres in slum clinics situated in the field areas adopted for SET work by Bombay Leprosy Project and (2) general hospital clinics situated predominantly outside the project area were analysed for dapsone/creatinine ratio to judge the extent of drug compliance. 201 out of 294 (68%) were regular and 82 out of 294 (28%) were irregular in consuming DDS as judged by urine examination. 67% of smear positive cases were regular. No difference was found in regularity between patients living within the project area (intensive follow up is done in this group to remind about treatment) and outside project area patients (no reminder followup is done). Similarly no difference was observed in regularity amongst the patients attending slum clinics and general hospital clinics. It could be stated that facilities for treatment offered at general hospitals or dispensaries and encouraging voluntary reporting could be quite fruitful and economical for obtaining better drug compliance in urban areas.

摘要

来自农村和城市麻风病防治中心的现有报告确凿无疑地证明,并非所有定期就诊的患者都能按时服用氨苯砜。目前尚无关于正在实施短期强化治疗(SET)项目的城市实地项目的报告。在本研究中,对294例各类患者(涂片阳性率为53%)的随机尿液样本进行了分析,这些患者主要接受氨苯砜单一疗法治疗,他们分别来自:(1)孟买麻风病项目选定开展SET工作的实地地区贫民窟诊所的麻风病治疗中心;(2)主要位于项目区域外的综合医院诊所。通过分析氨苯砜/肌酐比值来判断药物依从性的程度。根据尿液检查判断,294例患者中有201例(68%)服药规律,294例中有82例(28%)服药不规律。涂片阳性病例中有67%服药规律。项目区域内的患者(该组进行强化随访以提醒治疗)和项目区域外的患者(不进行提醒随访)在服药规律方面没有差异。同样,在贫民窟诊所和综合医院诊所就诊的患者之间,服药规律情况也没有差异。可以说,综合医院或药房提供的治疗设施以及鼓励自愿报告,对于在城市地区获得更好的药物依从性可能非常有效且经济。

相似文献

1
Dapsone compliance in an urban field project.城市实地项目中氨苯砜的依从性
Lepr India. 1983 Jan;55(1):117-21.
2
Pattern of drug compliance in leprosy patients attending urban centres--a longitudinal study.城市中心麻风病患者的药物依从性模式——一项纵向研究。
Indian J Lepr. 1990 Jul-Sep;62(3):305-9.
3
Field application of combined therapy for infectious leprosy cases. A feasibility study in Bombay.传染性麻风病例联合治疗的现场应用。孟买的一项可行性研究。
Lepr India. 1983 Jul;55(3):485-9.
4
Operational study to monitor the regularity of dapsone intake by leprosy out-patients.
Lepr India. 1983 Jul;55(3):521-7.
5
Irregularity of Dapsone intake in infectious leprosy patients attending an urban treatment centre--its magnitude and causes.城市治疗中心就诊的感染性麻风病患者中氨苯砜摄入不规律情况——程度及原因
Lepr India. 1978 Jan;50(1):45-53.
6
Regularity of dapsone intake by leprosy patients attending urban treatment centre.
Lepr India. 1977 Apr;49(2):207-15.
7
Utilization of medical agencies and treatment compliance by urban (Madras) leprosy patients.
Lepr India. 1983 Apr;55(2):322-32.
8
Field follow-up of leprosy cases in an urban area.城市地区麻风病病例的现场随访
Indian J Lepr. 1984 Oct-Dec;56(4):861-7.
9
Monitoring the regularity of self administration of dapsone by leprosy patients.
Lepr India. 1982 Oct;54(4):664-70.
10
Impact of multidrug therapy on leprosy in Baroda district (Gujarat).
Indian J Lepr. 1989 Apr;61(2):179-89.