Clerc D, Sallière D, Segond P, Bisson M, Massias P
Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic. 1983 Apr;50(4):281-7.
The authors made a comparative study of the effectiveness and tolerance of D-penicillamine (DP) and pyrithioxine (Pyr) and investigated possible prognostic factors for the tolerance and effectiveness of these two treatments. This retrospective study concerned 150 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). 86 patients were treated with DP and 64 were treated with Pyr. The percentage effectiveness, evaluated in terms of morning stiffness and the articular index as well as the need for steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, attained 67.4 p. cent with DP and 51.6 p. cent with Pyr. Suspension of treatment because of ineffectiveness, was more frequent with Pyr. The changes in the following laboratory parameters were also compared: ESR, rheumatoid serology, ANF, C3 and C4 complement levels, IgG, IgA and IgM levels. The treatment was stopped definitively because of intolerance in 37.2 p. cent of cases with DP and in 29.7 p. cent of cases with Pyr. Serious renal and haematological complications are essentially, but not exclusively, due to DP.
作者对青霉胺(DP)和吡硫醇(Pyr)的有效性及耐受性进行了比较研究,并探究了这两种治疗方法耐受性和有效性的可能预后因素。这项回顾性研究涉及150例类风湿关节炎(RA)患者。86例患者接受DP治疗,64例患者接受Pyr治疗。根据晨僵、关节指数以及使用甾体和非甾体抗炎药的需求评估,DP治疗的有效率为67.4%,Pyr治疗的有效率为51.6%。因无效而停药的情况在Pyr治疗组中更为常见。还比较了以下实验室参数的变化:红细胞沉降率(ESR)、类风湿血清学、抗核因子(ANF)、C3和C4补体水平、免疫球蛋白G(IgG)、免疫球蛋白A(IgA)和免疫球蛋白M(IgM)水平。因不耐受而最终停药的情况在DP治疗组中占37.2%,在Pyr治疗组中占29.7%。严重的肾脏和血液学并发症主要(但不仅限于)由DP引起。