Suppr超能文献

[对强直性脊柱炎中骶髂关节炎分期的批评]

[Criticism of sacroiliitis staging in ankylosing spondylitis].

作者信息

Dihlmann W

出版信息

Z Rheumatol. 1983 Mar-Apr;42(2):49-57.

PMID:6880402
Abstract

Information-theoretical considerations demonstrate the uselessness, in terms of understanding and diagnosis, of seven different systems for grading sacroiliitis in ankylosing spondylitis used by German, French, Canadian, Norwegian, Swedish, and Swiss authors. The illustrations prove that it is not possible to differentiate between a normal and abnormal (inflammatory) x-ray of the sacroiliac joints without the application of tomography. A grading system promises diagnostic and communicative success only when based upon tomography results (6 standard sections in adults), and when it takes the "multicolored picture" into consideration ("multicolored picture": no = sacroiliitis stage 0; yes = stage 1; complete bilateral ankylosis: yes = stage 2).

摘要

信息论考量表明,德国、法国、加拿大、挪威、瑞典和瑞士的作者所使用的七种不同强直性脊柱炎骶髂关节炎分级系统,在理解和诊断方面毫无用处。这些例证证明,若不应用断层扫描,就无法区分骶髂关节的正常与异常(炎性)X光片。只有基于断层扫描结果(成人6个标准切片)并考虑“彩色图像”时,分级系统才能保证诊断和交流的成功(“彩色图像”:否 = 骶髂关节炎0期;是 = 1期;完全双侧融合:是 = 2期)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验