Ransohoff D F, Gracie W A, Wolfenson L B, Neuhauser D
Ann Intern Med. 1983 Aug;99(2):199-204. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-99-2-199.
Decision analysis was done to compare the consequences of prophylactic cholecystectomy with expectant management for silent gallstone disease. Probability values were derived from a study of the natural history of silent gallstone disease, published cholecystectomy mortality rates, and life tables. The two strategies were compared by calculating cumulative numbers of person-years lost for hypothetical cohorts of men and women. Prophylactic cholecystectomy slightly decreases survival. A 30-year-old man choosing prophylactic cholecystectomy instead of expectant management would lose, on average, 4 days of life; a 50-year-old man would lose 18 days. Consideration of monetary costs and discounting further disfavors prophylactic cholecystectomy. Sensitivity analysis shows that differences between the two strategies remain small over a broad range of probability values, both for men and women.
进行了决策分析,以比较预防性胆囊切除术与对无症状胆结石疾病进行观察性处理的后果。概率值源自对无症状胆结石疾病自然史的一项研究、已发表的胆囊切除术死亡率以及生命表。通过计算假设的男性和女性队列损失的人年累计数来比较这两种策略。预防性胆囊切除术会略微降低生存率。一名30岁选择预防性胆囊切除术而非观察性处理的男性,平均会损失4天的生命;一名50岁的男性会损失18天。考虑货币成本和贴现后,预防性胆囊切除术更不占优势。敏感性分析表明,在广泛的概率值范围内,男性和女性的两种策略之间的差异仍然很小。