Suppr超能文献

胆结石的医学管理:一项成本效益分析。

Medical management of gallstones: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

作者信息

Weinstein M C, Coley C M, Richter J M

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 1990 Jul-Aug;5(4):277-84. doi: 10.1007/BF02600391.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Ursodeoxycholic acid (ursodiol) is an oral dissolution agent recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of cholelithiasis. The authors conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing ursodiol with elective cholecystectomy and expectant management for men and women of ages 50 and 70 with typical chronic biliary symptoms.

DESIGN

Using published literature and national cost data, the authors performed a decision analysis in which the outcome measures were life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy, and expected lifetime treatment cost.

PATIENTS

The analysis applies to patients with symptoms of biliary colic, noncalcified gallstones less than 20 mm in diameter, and functioning oral cholecystograms, who are candidates for elective cholecystectomy. Excluded were patients with acute cholecystitis or known or suspected common bile duct stones.

RESULTS

Ursodiol is both clinically advantageous and less expensive than surgery for symptomatic men aged 64 or more, and for symptomatic women aged 69 or more. At ages younger than these, the clinical advantage of surgery is small and could be nullified if ursodiol were targeted at patients for whom dissolution is most likely to be effective, based on evidence of stone size and composition. Expected lifetime costs of ursodiol range from $300-400 more than surgery for 50-year-olds to $700-1,000 less than surgery for 70-year-olds. Ursodiol is the preferred choice for patients throughout this age range who are at significantly elevated risk of operative mortality.

CONCLUSION

Ursodiol is a clinically advantageous and cost-effective alternative to elective cholecystectomy, especially for older and high-risk patients.

摘要

目的

熊去氧胆酸(熊二醇)是一种口服溶石剂,最近被美国食品药品监督管理局批准用于治疗胆结石。作者进行了一项成本效益分析,比较了熊二醇与择期胆囊切除术以及对年龄在50岁和70岁、有典型慢性胆道症状的男性和女性进行观察等待治疗的效果。

设计

作者利用已发表的文献和国家成本数据进行了一项决策分析,其中结果指标为预期寿命、质量调整预期寿命和预期终身治疗成本。

患者

该分析适用于有胆绞痛症状、直径小于20毫米的非钙化胆结石且口服胆囊造影正常、适合择期胆囊切除术的患者。排除患有急性胆囊炎或已知或疑似胆总管结石的患者。

结果

对于64岁及以上有症状的男性和69岁及以上有症状的女性,熊二醇在临床上既具有优势,成本也低于手术。在这些年龄以下,手术的临床优势较小,如果根据结石大小和成分的证据,将熊二醇用于溶石最可能有效的患者,手术的优势可能会被抵消。熊二醇的预期终身成本比50岁患者的手术成本高300 - 400美元,比70岁患者的手术成本低700 - 1000美元。对于在整个这个年龄范围内手术死亡率显著升高的患者,熊二醇是首选。

结论

熊二醇是择期胆囊切除术在临床上具有优势且成本效益高的替代方案,尤其适用于老年和高危患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验