Pritchard D W, Wood M M
Biofeedback Self Regul. 1983 Mar;8(1):165-75. doi: 10.1007/BF01000546.
In view of the importance attached to the frontalis muscles by researchers into the etiology of head pain and its treatment by biofeedback techniques, it is surprising that no data have yet been reported on the functioning of the occipitalis muscles, which have a close physiological relationship to the frontales. This study explores the response of the frontalis and occipitalis muscles under a condition of experimental stress. Migraine and tension-headache sufferers were separately compared with a headache-free control group under four conditions: baseline, while listening to instructions, while carrying out an auditory vigilance task, and for a further resting period equivalent to baseline. Results showed that tension levels in the frontalis muscles were not elevated at rest in any of the experimental groups, nor were they significantly responsive to the experimental task. The occipitales however proved to have significantly higher levels in both the tension-headache and migraine groups during the task and recovery periods. The results for the tension group reached significance because of a drop in control group values. These results may have significance in determining the best site for electrode placement in biofeedback.
鉴于研究头痛病因的人员对额肌的重视以及生物反馈技术对其进行治疗的情况,令人惊讶的是,尚未有关于枕肌功能的数据报道,而枕肌与额肌有着密切的生理关系。本研究探讨了实验性应激条件下额肌和枕肌的反应。将偏头痛和紧张性头痛患者分别与无头痛对照组在四种条件下进行比较:基线状态、听指令时、执行听觉警觉任务时以及相当于基线的进一步休息期。结果显示,在任何实验组中,额肌在静息时的紧张水平均未升高,对实验任务也无明显反应。然而,枕肌在紧张性头痛组和偏头痛组的任务期和恢复期的紧张水平明显更高。由于对照组数值下降,紧张组的结果达到了显著水平。这些结果对于确定生物反馈中电极放置的最佳位置可能具有重要意义。