Suppr超能文献

多学科持续营养教育项目的设计考量

Design considerations for multidisciplinary continuing nutrition education programs.

作者信息

Hain W F, Howell B B, Crosby L O, Mullen J L

出版信息

JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1982 Nov-Dec;6(6):522-5. doi: 10.1177/0148607182006006522.

Abstract

A multidisciplinary group of nutritional care providers was surveyed to assess degree of agreement on the relative importance of various areas of nutrition knowledge. A 35-item nutrition content area survey was mailed to a stratified, random sample (n = 400) of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) membership representing dietitians, nurses, pharmacists, and physicians. Through the use of modified Delphi survey, respondents rated each content area as 'essential,' 'useful,' or 'nonessential' for inclusion in a proposed test to assess nutrition knowledge. Respondents from all disciplines agreed that they should be knowledgeable in 22 of the 35 content areas. Chi square tests were used to assess significant response differences among disciplines. Systematic differences were primarily between dietitians and pharmacists. The study results provide direction to multidisciplinary continuing nutrition education program planners regarding appropriate content for combined discipline programs as well as for those more discipline-specific.

摘要

对一组多学科营养护理提供者进行了调查,以评估他们对营养知识各个领域相对重要性的共识程度。一份包含35个项目的营养内容领域调查问卷被邮寄给美国肠外肠内营养学会(ASPEN)会员的分层随机样本(n = 400),这些会员代表了营养师、护士、药剂师和医生。通过使用改良的德尔菲调查法,受访者将每个内容领域评定为纳入一项拟议的营养知识评估测试中的“必要”“有用”或“非必要”。所有学科的受访者都认为,在35个内容领域中的22个领域他们应该具备相关知识。卡方检验用于评估不同学科之间显著的回答差异。系统性差异主要存在于营养师和药剂师之间。研究结果为多学科持续营养教育项目规划者提供了指导,涉及联合学科项目以及更具学科针对性项目的合适内容。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验