Asai D J, Brokaw C J, Thompson W C, Wilson L
Cell Motil. 1982;2(6):599-614. doi: 10.1002/cm.970020608.
Two monoclonal antibodies reactive for alpha-tubulin but not for beta-tubulin have been prepared, characterized in terms of their relative binding to tubulins from different sources by a solid-phase binding assay, immunoautoradiography, and indirect immunofluorescence, and utilized to study flagellar motility. Our results demonstrate that alpha-tubulins from different species, and even from different tissues of the same species, are nonidentical. Especially interesting was the observation that one of the antibodies, Ab2, immunofluorescently stained microtubules of chick embryo fibroblast cells, but was completely unreactive for microtubules of rat kangaroo (PtK2) fibroblasts; a different antibody, Ab1, stained both cell types. Results of these and additional experiments clearly show that Ab1 and Ab2 recognize discrete and different epitopes on alpha-tubulin. Monoclonal antitubulins Ab1 and Ab2 each inhibited the bend amplitude of reactivated sea urchin spermatozoa without affecting beat frequencies or the ability of the outer doublet microtubules to slide past each other in elastase-digested models. These results, together with those obtained previously using rabbit polyclonal antitubulin antibodies [Asai and Brokaw, 1980], demonstrate that inhibition of bend amplitude is a common property of antitubulin antibodies and is not due to the binding of antibodies to one specific site on the axoneme. Our results suggest that tubulin subunit conformational changes may occur on the outer doublet lattice and may be integrally involved in the mechanism and control of flagellar bending.
已经制备了两种对α微管蛋白有反应但对β微管蛋白无反应的单克隆抗体,通过固相结合测定、免疫放射自显影和间接免疫荧光对它们与不同来源微管蛋白的相对结合进行了表征,并用于研究鞭毛运动。我们的结果表明,来自不同物种,甚至来自同一物种不同组织的α微管蛋白是不相同的。特别有趣的是观察到其中一种抗体Ab2对鸡胚成纤维细胞的微管进行免疫荧光染色,但对大鼠袋鼠(PtK2)成纤维细胞的微管完全无反应;另一种不同的抗体Ab1对两种细胞类型都有染色。这些以及其他实验的结果清楚地表明,Ab1和Ab2识别α微管蛋白上离散且不同的表位。单克隆抗微管蛋白抗体Ab1和Ab2各自抑制了再活化的海胆精子的弯曲幅度,而不影响搏动频率或在弹性蛋白酶消化模型中外侧双联体微管相互滑动的能力。这些结果与先前使用兔多克隆抗微管蛋白抗体获得的结果[浅井和布罗考,1980年]一起表明,弯曲幅度的抑制是抗微管蛋白抗体的共同特性,并非由于抗体与轴丝上一个特定位点的结合。我们的结果表明,微管蛋白亚基构象变化可能发生在外侧双联体晶格上,并且可能整体参与鞭毛弯曲的机制和控制。