• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

受虐儿童寄养安置的决定因素。

Determinants of foster care placement for the maltreated child.

作者信息

Runyan D K, Gould C L, Trost D C, Loda F A

出版信息

Child Abuse Negl. 1982;6(3):343-50. doi: 10.1016/0145-2134(82)90039-4.

DOI:10.1016/0145-2134(82)90039-4
PMID:6892318
Abstract

This study examined the records of the North Carolina Central Registry of Child Abuse and Neglect to determine which social, family, and child characteristics were most influential in the decision to place a child in foster care. These records contained all theoretically relevant factors as well as demographic data. Analysis included the computation of odds ratios for foster care for each of 250 variables. A maximum likelihood logistic regression model was constructed to obtain the independent and cumulative contribution of each factor. Some expected variables such as parental stress factors (substance abuse) and types of abuse (burns and scalds) placed a child at a significant risk for placement in foster care (p less than 0.01). However, less obvious factors such as referral source (law enforcement agencies) or geographic area also placed children at risk. Overall, the model explained little of the variance of these decisions (R2 = 0.168) and poorly predicted placement (sensitivity 66.3 per cent, specificity 74.6 per cent). Using existing data, we were unable to adequately describe the decision process in selecting foster care.

摘要

本研究查阅了北卡罗来纳州虐待与忽视儿童中央登记处的记录,以确定哪些社会、家庭和儿童特征在决定将儿童安置到寄养家庭中最具影响力。这些记录包含了所有理论上相关的因素以及人口统计数据。分析包括计算250个变量中每个变量进入寄养家庭的比值比。构建了一个最大似然逻辑回归模型,以获得每个因素的独立和累积贡献。一些预期变量,如父母压力因素(药物滥用)和虐待类型(烧伤和烫伤),使儿童面临被安置到寄养家庭的显著风险(p小于0.01)。然而,一些不太明显的因素,如转介来源(执法机构)或地理区域,也使儿童面临风险。总体而言,该模型对这些决策的方差解释很少(R2 = 0.168),对安置的预测效果不佳(敏感性66.3%,特异性74.6%)。利用现有数据,我们无法充分描述选择寄养家庭的决策过程。

相似文献

1
Determinants of foster care placement for the maltreated child.受虐儿童寄养安置的决定因素。
Child Abuse Negl. 1982;6(3):343-50. doi: 10.1016/0145-2134(82)90039-4.
2
Determinants of foster care placement for the maltreated child.受虐儿童进入寄养家庭安置的决定因素。
Am J Public Health. 1981 Jul;71(7):706-11. doi: 10.2105/ajph.71.7.706.
3
Educational attainment for youth who were maltreated in adolescence: Investigating the influence of maltreatment type and foster care placement.青少年时期受虐待的青年的教育程度:探讨虐待类型和寄养安置的影响。
Child Abuse Negl. 2018 May;79:234-244. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
4
Kinship Care and Foster Care: A Comparison of Out-of-Home Placement From the Perspective of Child Abuse Experts in North Carolina.亲属照料与寄养照料:从北卡罗来纳州儿童虐待问题专家的视角对家庭外安置的比较
N C Med J. 2019 Nov-Dec;80(6):325-331. doi: 10.18043/ncm.80.6.325.
5
Relationship between reason for placement and medical findings among children in foster care.寄养儿童安置原因与医学检查结果之间的关系。
Pediatrics. 1998 Feb;101(2):201-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.2.201.
6
Placement decisions and disparities among Aboriginal children: further analysis of the Canadian incidence study of reported child abuse and neglect part A: comparisons of the 1998 and 2003 surveys.原住民儿童的安置决策和差异:对加拿大报告的儿童虐待和忽视情况的发生率研究 A 部分的进一步分析:1998 年和 2003 年调查的比较。
Child Abuse Negl. 2013 Jan;37(1):47-60. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2012.10.001. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
7
The decision of out-of-home placement in residential care after parental neglect: Empirically testing a psychosocial model.父母忽视后儿童被安置在寄宿照料机构的决定:对一种社会心理模型的实证检验
Child Abuse Negl. 2015 Nov;49:35-49. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.03.014. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
8
Kinship care for the safety, permanency, and well-being of children removed from the home for maltreatment.亲属抚养是为了那些因遭受虐待而被带离家庭的儿童的安全、永久性安置和福祉。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21(1):CD006546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006546.pub2.
9
Returning children home: clinical decision making in cases of child abuse and neglect.让儿童回家:虐待与忽视儿童案件中的临床决策
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1986 Apr;56(2):253-262. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1986.tb02725.x.
10
Exploring alternate specifications to explain agency-level effects in placement decisions regarding aboriginal children: further analysis of the Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect Part B.探索替代规范以解释有关原住民儿童安置决策中的机构层面效应:对加拿大报告的儿童虐待和忽视部分 B 的发生率研究的进一步分析。
Child Abuse Negl. 2013 Jan;37(1):61-76. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2012.10.002. Epub 2012 Dec 23.