Young R C, Pandi G R
J Clin Psychol. 1978 Jul;34(3):693-4. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197807)34:3<693::aid-jclp2270340323>3.0.co;2-u.
Repeated measures were collected on 99 patients by use of two assessment instruments, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, based on an interview, and the Psychotic Inpatient Profile, based on observations of ward behavior. For each S, scores from the two instruments were matched for day of rating and intercorrelated. Factor analysis revealed two factors, each with substantial contributions from both rating instruments. The first factor, interpreted as measuring thought disorder, accounted for 19% of the total varlance. The second factor, termed mood disorder, accounted for 12% of the variance. A third factor accounted for an additional 9% of variance, but had high loadings only on scales of the BPRS.
使用两种评估工具对99名患者进行了重复测量,一种是基于访谈的简明精神病评定量表,另一种是基于病房行为观察的精神病住院患者概况量表。对于每个受试者,两种工具的评分在评分日期上进行匹配并相互关联。因子分析揭示了两个因子,每个因子在两种评分工具中都有显著贡献。第一个因子被解释为测量思维障碍,占总方差的19%。第二个因子称为情绪障碍,占方差的12%。第三个因子又占方差的9%,但仅在简明精神病评定量表的量表上有高载荷。