• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人的模型与政策模型:十年后对《退出、呼吁与忠诚》的反思

Models of man and models of policy: reflections of "Exit, Voice, and Loyalty" ten years later.

作者信息

Klein R

出版信息

Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1980 Summer;58(3):416-29.

PMID:6903795
Abstract

The challenge of health care policy is how to combine sensitivity to both consumer preferences (the economic model) and citizen wishes (the political model): what either wants the other may wish to deny him. Competing economic (exit) and political (voice) activities in response to deterioration in the quality of a service, however, may be an inadequate framework to encompass discontent with the complex mix of types of services offered. The "political market" in which decisions about health care are made is suggested for further exploration.

摘要

医疗保健政策面临的挑战在于如何兼顾对消费者偏好(经济模式)和公民意愿(政治模式)的敏感度:一方想要的,另一方可能希望予以拒绝。然而,针对服务质量下降而展开的相互竞争的经济(退出)和政治(发声)活动,可能不足以涵盖对所提供的复杂服务类型组合的不满。文中建议对做出医疗保健决策的“政治市场”做进一步探究。

相似文献

1
Models of man and models of policy: reflections of "Exit, Voice, and Loyalty" ten years later.人的模型与政策模型:十年后对《退出、呼吁与忠诚》的反思
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1980 Summer;58(3):416-29.
2
"Exit, Voice, and Loyalty:" further reflections and a survey of recent contributions.《退出、呼吁与忠诚》:进一步思考及近期相关研究综述
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1980 Summer;58(3):430-53.
3
Consumer strategies in health care acquisition in the United Kingdom and the United States.英国和美国医疗保健采购中的消费者策略。
Sch Inq Nurs Pract. 1991 Spring;5(1):21-33; discussion 35-8.
4
Consumerism in the NHS.英国国民医疗服务体系中的消费主义
Health Soc Serv J. 1985 May 30;95(4950):1-8 suppl.
5
Voice and choice by delegation.委托授权的发言权和选择权。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2013 Feb;38(1):57-87. doi: 10.1215/03616878-1898803. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
6
On public values and private regulation: some reflections on cost containment strategies.
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1981 Spring;59(2):269-96.
7
It's time to get mad about the outrageous cost of health care: why it's so high, how it affects your wallet--and yes, what you can do about it.是时候对医疗保健的高昂费用感到愤怒了:为何费用如此之高,它如何影响你的钱包——没错,以及你能对此做些什么。
Consum Rep. 2014 Nov;79(11):40-8.
8
No exit and the organization of voice in biotechnology and pharmaceuticals.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2003 Apr-Jun;28(2-3):473-507. doi: 10.1215/03616878-28-2-3-473.
9
Competition and regulation: the consumer choice health plan alternative.竞争与监管:消费者选择健康保险计划的替代方案
Med Group Manage. 1980 Jul-Aug;27(4):58-64.
10
Let's explore a truly free market, consumer driven health care system.让我们探索一个真正自由的、由消费者驱动的医疗保健系统。
Iowa Med. 2007 Mar-Apr;97(2):8.

引用本文的文献

1
Regulated competition and citizen participation: lessons from Israel.规范竞争与公民参与:来自以色列的经验教训。
Health Expect. 2000 Jun;3(2):90-96. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2000.00065.x.
2
Ideologies, utopias, and the debate about health care.意识形态、乌托邦与医疗保健辩论
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Jan 24;282(6260):332-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.282.6260.332.