Suppr超能文献

头围和腹围测量法估算胎儿体重不同方法的比较(作者译)

[Comparison of different methods for estimating fetal weight by cephalo- and abdominometry (author's transl)].

作者信息

Bernaschek G, Kratochwil A

出版信息

Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1981 Feb;41(2):114-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1036975.

Abstract

To check the accuracy of different published methods of fetal weight estimation based on head and abdominal parameters, all methods were used in every individual case in 123 pregnancies. It became apparent that the single methods gave the best results in different indications. As far as normal fetal development at term is concerned the best results were achieved by estimating the weight from the biparietal and the abdominal diameters whereas in macrosomy the prediction of fetal weight became much more precise in using head and abdominal circumferences. In premature and small-for-date infants, however, the best results were recorded if only the abdominal circumference was used for this reason reflecting the importance of the severe reduction in volume of the big parenchymateous organs of the abdomen.

摘要

为检验基于头部和腹部参数的不同已发表胎儿体重估计方法的准确性,对123例妊娠的每个个体病例都使用了所有方法。结果表明,单一方法在不同指征下效果最佳。就足月正常胎儿发育而言,通过双顶径和腹径估计体重可获得最佳结果,而在巨大儿中,使用头围和腹围预测胎儿体重则更为精确。然而,对于早产儿和小于胎龄儿,仅使用腹围可获得最佳结果,因为这反映了腹部实质器官体积严重减小的重要性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验